146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2704502)
1. The significance of a negative Papanicolaou smear with hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis.
Andrews S; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):751-3. PubMed ID: 2704502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical significance of hyperkeratosis and parakeratosis in otherwise negative Papanicolaou smears.
Sorosky JI; Kaminski PF; Wheelock JB; Podczaski ES
Gynecol Oncol; 1990 Nov; 39(2):132-4. PubMed ID: 2227586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Paired Papanicolaou smears in the evaluation of atypical squamous cells.
Andrews S; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):747-50. PubMed ID: 2704501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
Davis GL; Hernandez E; Davis JL; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan; 69(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 3540762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical significance of hyperkeratosis on otherwise normal Papanicolaou smears.
Johnson CA; Lorenzetti LA; Liese BS; Ruble RA
J Fam Pract; 1991 Oct; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 1919451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The significance of moderate and severe inflammation on class I Papanicolaou smear.
Lawley TB; Lee RB; Kapela R
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):997-9. PubMed ID: 2234731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women with human immunodeficiency virus infection and abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a prospective study of colposcopy and clinical outcome.
Adachi A; Fleming I; Burk RD; Ho GY; Klein RS
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 8437789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aggressive evaluation for atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
Lindheim SR; Smith-Nguyen G
J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):971-3. PubMed ID: 2246766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The significance of age in the colposcopic evaluation of women with atypical apanicolaou smears.
Shingleton HM; Partridge EE; Austin JM
Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Jan; 49(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 831165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report.
Luesley D; Downey G
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cytologic correlation between the Bethesda system and colposcopic biopsy].
González Sánchez JL; Pérez Guerrero C; Celorio Aguilera G; Chávez Barambila J; Ríos Montiel FA
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1998 Aug; 66():330-4. PubMed ID: 9745194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Evaluation by colposcopy, biopsies, and endocervical curettage.
Townsend DE; Ostergard DR; Mishell DR; Hirose FM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Oct; 108(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 5484600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The significance of atypical glandular cells on routine cervical cytologic testing in a community-based population.
Chin AB; Bristow RE; Korst LM; Walts A; Lagasse LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1278-82. PubMed ID: 10871439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between cervical cytology and biopsy in an air force colposcopy clinic.
Smith KH; Bostrom SG; Galey WT
J Reprod Med; 1985 Sep; 30(9):681-4. PubMed ID: 4057183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of wet mount and cervical cultures at the time of cervical cytology in asymptomatic women.
Eltabbakh GH; Eltabbakh GD; Broekhuizen FF; Griner BT
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 7898823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the endocervical brush and the endocervical curettage for the evaluation of the endocervical canal.
Martin D; Umpierre SA; Villamarzo G; Sánchez O; Sánchez J; Carrodeguas J; Adamsons K
P R Health Sci J; 1995 Sep; 14(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 8588020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of repeat cytology at the time of colposcopy for the evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on Papanicolaou smears.
Wheelock JB; Kaminski PF
J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):815-7. PubMed ID: 2795564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia associated with exposure to diethylstilbestrol in utero: a clinical and pathologic study.
Orr JW; Shingleton HM; Gore H; Austin JM; Hatch KD; Soong SJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jul; 58(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 7195532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
