These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2704513)

  • 1. Comparison of copolymer staple versus chromic suture during hysterectomy: gross, histologic, and microbiologic findings.
    Weinstein SA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):829-30. PubMed ID: 2704513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of copolymer staple versus chromic suture during hysterectomy: gross, histologic, and microbiologic findings.
    McNeeley SG; Elkins TE; Portz DM; Warren J; DeLancey JO
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Dec; 72(6):862-5. PubMed ID: 3186094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic clips. Evaluation of absorbable and titanium with regard to hemostasis and tissue reactivity.
    Grainger DA; Meyer WR; DeCherney AH; Diamond MP
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Jul; 36(7):493-5. PubMed ID: 1834838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the degree of abdominal adhesion formation associated with chromic catgut and polypropylene suture materials.
    Rochat MC; Lin J; Pope ER; Carson WL; Wagner-Mann CC; Pace LW
    Am J Vet Res; 1996 Jun; 57(6):943-7. PubMed ID: 8725827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uterine compression suture without hysterotomy--why a non-absorbable suture should be avoided.
    Cotzias C; Girling J
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):150-2. PubMed ID: 15814394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of peritoneal closure and suture material on adhesion formation in a rabbit model.
    Whitfield RR; Stills HF; Huls HR; Crouch JM; Hurd WW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 197(6):644.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18060964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adhesion induction by suture of varying tissue reactivity and caliber.
    Holtz G
    Int J Fertil; 1982; 27(3):134-5. PubMed ID: 6128317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Suturing apparatus using absorbable staples in hysterectomy].
    Bendvold E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1986 Dec; 106(34-36):2987-9, 70. PubMed ID: 3810623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adhesion formation and prevention after peritoneal injury and repair in the rabbit.
    McDonald MN; Elkins TE; Wortham GF; Stovall TG; Ling FW; McNeeley SG
    J Reprod Med; 1988 May; 33(5):436-9. PubMed ID: 3290475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auto-suture in abdominal hysterectomy.
    Kahn E
    Obstet Gynecol; 1968 Jun; 31(6):852-4. PubMed ID: 5760241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abdominal hysterectomy: comparison of closed cuff, open cuff, and staple closure techniques.
    Wolf D
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1980 Jun; 79(10):625-31. PubMed ID: 6993437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Remote results of mechanical suture of the ureter].
    Uchugina AF
    Urol Nefrol (Mosk); 1974; 39(4):29-31. PubMed ID: 4605916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The use of an automatic stapler in abdominal hysterectomies. Our experience].
    Rosaschino P; Palmerio G; Zambetti E; Gambarini A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1995 Apr; 47(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 7644095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pursestring complication using the Auto Suture Company PREMIUM CEEA stapling device.
    Fozard JB; Lee PW
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1989 Jun; 32(6):538-9. PubMed ID: 2791794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative evaluation of mechanical and manual anastomosis sutures in complicated forms of colonic cancer].
    Ushakov IuM; Krasnov IuO
    Khirurgiia (Mosk); 1981 Apr; (4):39-44. PubMed ID: 7014993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unusual complications following abdominal hysterectomy: dyspareunia and consort glans laceration after vaginal cuff stapling.
    Zerner J; Miller BA; Nelson BD
    J Maine Med Assoc; 1980 Jun; 71(6):169-70, 73. PubMed ID: 6993594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of tissue ischemia in the pathogenesis of anastomotic stricture.
    Chung RS; Hitch DC; Armstrong DN
    Surgery; 1988 Nov; 104(5):824-9. PubMed ID: 3187897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective comparison of abdominal hysterectomy using absorbable staples.
    Beresford JM; Moher D
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jun; 176(6):555-8. PubMed ID: 8322128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Use of the TA 55 surgical stapler in abdominal hysterectomy].
    Seibold H; Krone HA
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1987 Mar; 47(3):210. PubMed ID: 3582931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ICVTS on-line discussion A. Advantages of suture closure of sternotomy incision wound.
    Sachithanandan A
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2007 Apr; 6(2):246. PubMed ID: 17669828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.