BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27045826)

  • 1. A Comparison Study for DNA Motif Modeling on Protein Binding Microarray.
    Wong KC; Li Y; Peng C; Wong HS
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2016; 13(2):261-71. PubMed ID: 27045826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolving Transcription Factor Binding Site Models From Protein Binding Microarray Data.
    Wong KC; Peng C; Li Y
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2017 Feb; 47(2):415-424. PubMed ID: 26887021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA motif elucidation using belief propagation.
    Wong KC; Chan TM; Peng C; Li Y; Zhang Z
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Sep; 41(16):e153. PubMed ID: 23814189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inferring intra-motif dependencies of DNA binding sites from ChIP-seq data.
    Eggeling R; Roos T; Myllymäki P; Grosse I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():375. PubMed ID: 26552868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions.
    Agius P; Arvey A; Chang W; Noble WS; Leslie C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Sep; 6(9):. PubMed ID: 20838582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative modeling of transcription factor binding specificities using DNA shape.
    Zhou T; Shen N; Yang L; Abe N; Horton J; Mann RS; Bussemaker HJ; Gordân R; Rohs R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(15):4654-9. PubMed ID: 25775564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality versus accuracy: result of a reanalysis of protein-binding microarrays from the DREAM5 challenge by using BayesPI2 including dinucleotide interdependence.
    Wang J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Aug; 15(1):289. PubMed ID: 25158938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. UniPROBE, update 2015: new tools and content for the online database of protein-binding microarray data on protein-DNA interactions.
    Hume MA; Barrera LA; Gisselbrecht SS; Bulyk ML
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Jan; 43(Database issue):D117-22. PubMed ID: 25378322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. BEESEM: estimation of binding energy models using HT-SELEX data.
    Ruan S; Swamidass SJ; Stormo GD
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Aug; 33(15):2288-2295. PubMed ID: 28379348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimally choosing PWM motif databases and sequence scanning approaches based on ChIP-seq data.
    Dabrowski M; Dojer N; Krystkowiak I; Kaminska B; Wilczynski B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():140. PubMed ID: 25927199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An algorithmic perspective of de novo cis-regulatory motif finding based on ChIP-seq data.
    Liu B; Yang J; Li Y; McDermaid A; Ma Q
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):1069-1081. PubMed ID: 28334268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A general approach for discriminative de novo motif discovery from high-throughput data.
    Grau J; Posch S; Grosse I; Keilwagen J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Nov; 41(21):e197. PubMed ID: 24057214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative analysis of transcription factor binding models learned from PBM, HT-SELEX and ChIP data.
    Orenstein Y; Shamir R
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Apr; 42(8):e63. PubMed ID: 24500199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Argo_CUDA: Exhaustive GPU based approach for motif discovery in large DNA datasets.
    Vishnevsky OV; Bocharnikov AV; Kolchanov NA
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Feb; 16(1):1740012. PubMed ID: 29281953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simultaneously learning DNA motif along with its position and sequence rank preferences through expectation maximization algorithm.
    Zhang Z; Chang CW; Hugo W; Cheung E; Sung WK
    J Comput Biol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):237-48. PubMed ID: 23461573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An algorithm for finding protein-DNA binding sites with applications to chromatin-immunoprecipitation microarray experiments.
    Liu XS; Brutlag DL; Liu JS
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):835-9. PubMed ID: 12101404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequential Integration of Fuzzy Clustering and Expectation Maximization for Transcription Factor Binding Site Identification.
    Yousefian-Jazi A; Choi J
    J Comput Biol; 2018 Nov; 25(11):1247-1256. PubMed ID: 30133315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational modeling of in vivo and in vitro protein-DNA interactions by multiple instance learning.
    Gao Z; Ruan J
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 33(14):2097-2105. PubMed ID: 28334224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of algorithms for inferring positional weight matrix motifs of transcription factor binding sites using protein binding microarray data.
    Orenstein Y; Linhart C; Shamir R
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e46145. PubMed ID: 23029415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing transcription factor motif drift from noisy decoy sequences.
    Reddy TE; DeLisi C; Shakhnovich BE
    Genome Inform; 2005; 16(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 16362907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.