These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27045852)

  • 1. Effects of parceling on model selection: Parcel-allocation variability in model ranking.
    Sterba SK; Rights JD
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Mar; 22(1):47-68. PubMed ID: 27045852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Problems with Rationales for Parceling that Fail to Consider Parcel-Allocation Variability.
    Sterba SK
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(2):264-287. PubMed ID: 30755036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accounting for Parcel-Allocation Variability in Practice: Combining Sources of Uncertainty and Choosing the Number of Allocations.
    Sterba SK; Rights JD
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(2-3):296-313. PubMed ID: 27054282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variability in Parameter Estimates and Model Fit Across Repeated Allocations of Items to Parcels.
    Sterba SK; MacCallum RC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2010 Mar; 45(2):322-58. PubMed ID: 26760288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of homogeneous and heterogeneous parceling strategies when latent variables represent multidimensional constructs.
    Cole DA; Perkins CE; Zelkowitz RL
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Jun; 21(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 26323000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Population performance of SEM parceling strategies under measurement and structural model misspecification.
    Rhemtulla M
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):348-368. PubMed ID: 26828780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parceling Cannot Reduce Factor Indeterminacy in Factor Analysis: A Research Note.
    Rigdon EE; Becker JM; Sarstedt M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):772-780. PubMed ID: 31292860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian Thurstonian models for ranking data using JAGS.
    Johnson TR; Kuhn KM
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):857-72. PubMed ID: 23539504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time to criterion latent growth models.
    Johnson TL; Hancock GR
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):690-707. PubMed ID: 30998039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factor analysis in psychological assessment research: Common pitfalls and recommendations.
    Sellbom M; Tellegen A
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Dec; 31(12):1428-1441. PubMed ID: 31120298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian ranking of sites for engineering safety improvements: decision parameter, treatability concept, statistical criterion, and spatial dependence.
    Miaou SP; Song JJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Jul; 37(4):699-720. PubMed ID: 15949462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample Size and Statistical Conclusions from Tests of Fit to the Rasch Model According to the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model (Rumm) Program in Health Outcome Measurement.
    Hagell P; Westergren A
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(4):416-431. PubMed ID: 28009589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling congruence in organizational research with latent moderated structural equations.
    Su R; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Tay L
    J Appl Psychol; 2019 Nov; 104(11):1404-1433. PubMed ID: 31045381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An R package for analyzing and modeling ranking data.
    Lee PH; Yu PL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 May; 13():65. PubMed ID: 23672645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structural equation modeling of paired-comparison and ranking data.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Böckenholt U
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Sep; 10(3):285-304. PubMed ID: 16221029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why the items versus parcels controversy needn't be one.
    Little TD; Rhemtulla M; Gibson K; Schoemann AM
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):285-300. PubMed ID: 23834418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Item Response Modeling of Paired Comparison and Ranking Data.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Brown A
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2010 Nov; 45(6):935-74. PubMed ID: 26760724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual influence on model selection.
    Sterba SK; Pek J
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Dec; 17(4):582-99. PubMed ID: 22845875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.