453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27046139)
21. An integrated science-based methodology to assess potential risks and implications of engineered nanomaterials.
Tolaymat T; El Badawy A; Sequeira R; Genaidy A
J Hazard Mater; 2015 Nov; 298():270-81. PubMed ID: 26079368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A review of the detection, fate and effects of engineered nanomaterials in wastewater treatment plants.
Neale PA; Jämting ÅK; Escher BI; Herrmann J
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(7):1440-53. PubMed ID: 24135091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bio-nano interface and environment: A critical review.
Pulido-Reyes G; Leganes F; Fernández-Piñas F; Rosal R
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Dec; 36(12):3181-3193. PubMed ID: 28731222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mechanisms involved in the impact of engineered nanomaterials on the joint toxicity with environmental pollutants.
Liu Y; Nie Y; Wang J; Wang J; Wang X; Chen S; Zhao G; Wu L; Xu A
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 Oct; 162():92-102. PubMed ID: 29990744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multimedia environmental distribution of engineered nanomaterials.
Liu HH; Cohen Y
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Mar; 48(6):3281-92. PubMed ID: 24548277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A critical review on the role of abiotic factors on the transformation, environmental identity and toxicity of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environment.
Kansara K; Bolan S; Radhakrishnan D; Palanisami T; Al-Muhtaseb AH; Bolan N; Vinu A; Kumar A; Karakoti A
Environ Pollut; 2022 Mar; 296():118726. PubMed ID: 34953948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Nanomaterials in the aquatic environment: A European Union-United States perspective on the status of ecotoxicity testing, research priorities, and challenges ahead.
Selck H; Handy RD; Fernandes TF; Klaine SJ; Petersen EJ
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 May; 35(5):1055-67. PubMed ID: 27089437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Toward a comprehensive and realistic risk evaluation of engineered nanomaterials in the urban water system.
Duester L; Burkhardt M; Gutleb AC; Kaegi R; Macken A; Meermann B; von der Kammer F
Front Chem; 2014; 2():39. PubMed ID: 25003102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing the Risk of Engineered Nanomaterials in the Environment: Development and Application of the nanoFate Model.
Garner KL; Suh S; Keller AA
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 May; 51(10):5541-5551. PubMed ID: 28443660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Use of engineered nanomaterials in the construction industry with specific emphasis on paints and their flows in construction and demolition waste in Switzerland.
Hincapié I; Caballero-Guzman A; Hiltbrunner D; Nowack B
Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():398-406. PubMed ID: 26164852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Flows of engineered nanomaterials through the recycling process in Switzerland.
Caballero-Guzman A; Sun T; Nowack B
Waste Manag; 2015 Feb; 36():33-43. PubMed ID: 25524750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Environmental risk assessment of engineered nano-SiO
Wang Y; Nowack B
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 May; 37(5):1387-1395. PubMed ID: 29315795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Regulation of engineered nanomaterials: current challenges, insights and future directions.
Lai RWS; Yeung KWY; Yung MMN; Djurišić AB; Giesy JP; Leung KMY
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(4):3060-3077. PubMed ID: 28639026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A review of selected engineered nanoparticles in the atmosphere: sources, transformations, and techniques for sampling and analysis.
Majestic BJ; Erdakos GB; Lewandowski M; Oliver KD; Willis RD; Kleindienst TE; Bhave PV
Int J Occup Environ Health; 2010; 16(4):488-507. PubMed ID: 21222392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Trophic transfer, transformation, and impact of engineered nanomaterials in terrestrial environments.
Gardea-Torresdey JL; Rico CM; White JC
Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(5):2526-40. PubMed ID: 24499408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Considering the forms of released engineered nanomaterials in probabilistic material flow analysis.
Adam V; Caballero-Guzman A; Nowack B
Environ Pollut; 2018 Dec; 243(Pt A):17-27. PubMed ID: 30170204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Release of engineered nanomaterials from polymer nanocomposites: diffusion, dissolution, and desorption.
Duncan TV; Pillai K
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Jan; 7(1):2-19. PubMed ID: 25485689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Environmental behavior of engineered nanomaterials in porous media: a review.
Park CM; Chu KH; Heo J; Her N; Jang M; Son A; Yoon Y
J Hazard Mater; 2016 May; 309():133-50. PubMed ID: 26882524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Aquatic Mesocosm Strategies for the Environmental Fate and Risk Assessment of Engineered Nanomaterials.
Carboni A; Slomberg DL; Nassar M; Santaella C; Masion A; Rose J; Auffan M
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Dec; 55(24):16270-16282. PubMed ID: 34854667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A review of the fate of engineered nanomaterials in municipal solid waste streams.
Part F; Berge N; Baran P; Stringfellow A; Sun W; Bartelt-Hunt S; Mitrano D; Li L; Hennebert P; Quicker P; Bolyard SC; Huber-Humer M
Waste Manag; 2018 May; 75():427-449. PubMed ID: 29477652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
