These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27046275)
1. Likelihood of obtaining Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 elevations among forensic psychiatric inpatients with screening elevations on the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test. Glassmire DM; Tarescavage AM; Gottfried ED Psychol Assess; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1586-1596. PubMed ID: 27046275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences between Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 sensitivity estimates among forensic inpatients: A criterion groups comparison. Tarescavage AM; Glassmire DM Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):488-502. PubMed ID: 27077677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The association between clinicians' initial judgments of feigning and outcomes on symptom validity measures among pretrial forensic psychiatric inpatients. Ng W; Mattos LA; Coffey CA; Molina SM; Gottfried ED; Glassmire DM Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 76():101698. PubMed ID: 33819780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-2nd Edition (SIRS-2): Use and Admissibility in Forensic Mental Health Assessment. Wygant DB; Tylicki JL; Disney LF; Connelly AI J Pers Assess; 2022; 104(2):265-280. PubMed ID: 34871131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the Response Bias Scale and Improbable Failure Scale in assessing feigned cognitive impairment. Grossi LM; Green D; Einzig S; Belfi B Psychol Assess; 2017 May; 29(5):531-541. PubMed ID: 27504905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Relationship Between Psychiatric and Cognitive Symptom Feigning Among Forensic Inpatients Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial. Gottfried E; Glassmire D Assessment; 2016 Dec; 23(6):672-682. PubMed ID: 26253572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for feigning in a civil forensic setting. Alwes YR; Clark JA; Berry DT; Granacher RP J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Feb; 30(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 18938665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of malingering: psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the structured interview of reported symptoms-2. Liu C; Liu Z; Chiu HF; Carl TW; Zhang H; Wang P; Wu G; Mwansisya TE; Cao L; Hu A; Wang Y; Xue Z BMC Psychiatry; 2013 Oct; 13():254. PubMed ID: 24106829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Malingering in a correctional setting: the use of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms in a jail sample. McDermott BE; Sokolov G Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):753-65. PubMed ID: 19743514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Forensic applications of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (MFAST): screening for feigned disorders in competency to stand trial evaluations. Jackson RL; Rogers R; Sewell KW Law Hum Behav; 2005 Apr; 29(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 15912724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The detection of feigning using multiple PAI scale elevations: a new index. Gaines MV; Giles CL; Morgan RD Assessment; 2013 Aug; 20(4):437-47. PubMed ID: 22946102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of malingering with repeat forensic evaluations: patient variability and possible misclassification on the SIRS and other feigning measures. Rogers R; Vitacco MJ; Kurus SJ J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 20305084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparability of Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-Second Edition (SIRS-2) classifications with external response bias criteria. Tylicki JL; Wygant DB; Tarescavage AM; Frederick RI; Tyner EA; Granacher RP; Sellbom M Psychol Assess; 2018 Sep; 30(9):1144-1159. PubMed ID: 29389175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the SIRS in compensation cases: an examination of its validity and generalizability. Rogers R; Payne JW; Berry DT; Granacher RP Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 18679780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for feigned psychiatric symptoms in a forensic sample by using the MMPI-2 and the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology. Lewis JL; Simcox AM; Berry DT Psychol Assess; 2002 Jun; 14(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 12056079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A pilot study on the Chinese Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in detecting feigned mental disorders: Simulators classified by using the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms. Chang YT; Tam WC; Shiah YJ; Chiang SK Psych J; 2017 Sep; 6(3):175-184. PubMed ID: 28613018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection strategies for malingering with the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test: a confirmatory factor analysis of its underlying dimensions. Vitacco MJ; Jackson RL; Rogers R; Neumann CS; Miller HA; Gabel J Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 18258736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The SIMS Screen for feigned mental disorders: the development of detection-based scales. Rogers R; Robinson EV; Gillard ND Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(4):455-66. PubMed ID: 25060144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of the Miller forensic assessment of symptoms test in psychiatric inpatients. Veazey CH; Wagner AL; Hays JR; Miller HA Psychol Rep; 2005 Jun; 96(3 Pt 1):771-4. PubMed ID: 16050637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New and improved? A comparison of the original and revised versions of the structured interview of reported symptoms. Green D; Rosenfeld B; Belfi B Assessment; 2013 Apr; 20(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 23242218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]