172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27046275)
1. Likelihood of obtaining Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 elevations among forensic psychiatric inpatients with screening elevations on the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test.
Glassmire DM; Tarescavage AM; Gottfried ED
Psychol Assess; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1586-1596. PubMed ID: 27046275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences between Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 sensitivity estimates among forensic inpatients: A criterion groups comparison.
Tarescavage AM; Glassmire DM
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):488-502. PubMed ID: 27077677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The association between clinicians' initial judgments of feigning and outcomes on symptom validity measures among pretrial forensic psychiatric inpatients.
Ng W; Mattos LA; Coffey CA; Molina SM; Gottfried ED; Glassmire DM
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 76():101698. PubMed ID: 33819780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-2nd Edition (SIRS-2): Use and Admissibility in Forensic Mental Health Assessment.
Wygant DB; Tylicki JL; Disney LF; Connelly AI
J Pers Assess; 2022; 104(2):265-280. PubMed ID: 34871131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the Response Bias Scale and Improbable Failure Scale in assessing feigned cognitive impairment.
Grossi LM; Green D; Einzig S; Belfi B
Psychol Assess; 2017 May; 29(5):531-541. PubMed ID: 27504905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Relationship Between Psychiatric and Cognitive Symptom Feigning Among Forensic Inpatients Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial.
Gottfried E; Glassmire D
Assessment; 2016 Dec; 23(6):672-682. PubMed ID: 26253572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for feigning in a civil forensic setting.
Alwes YR; Clark JA; Berry DT; Granacher RP
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Feb; 30(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 18938665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of malingering: psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the structured interview of reported symptoms-2.
Liu C; Liu Z; Chiu HF; Carl TW; Zhang H; Wang P; Wu G; Mwansisya TE; Cao L; Hu A; Wang Y; Xue Z
BMC Psychiatry; 2013 Oct; 13():254. PubMed ID: 24106829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Malingering in a correctional setting: the use of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms in a jail sample.
McDermott BE; Sokolov G
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):753-65. PubMed ID: 19743514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Forensic applications of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (MFAST): screening for feigned disorders in competency to stand trial evaluations.
Jackson RL; Rogers R; Sewell KW
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Apr; 29(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 15912724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The detection of feigning using multiple PAI scale elevations: a new index.
Gaines MV; Giles CL; Morgan RD
Assessment; 2013 Aug; 20(4):437-47. PubMed ID: 22946102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of malingering with repeat forensic evaluations: patient variability and possible misclassification on the SIRS and other feigning measures.
Rogers R; Vitacco MJ; Kurus SJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 20305084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparability of Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-Second Edition (SIRS-2) classifications with external response bias criteria.
Tylicki JL; Wygant DB; Tarescavage AM; Frederick RI; Tyner EA; Granacher RP; Sellbom M
Psychol Assess; 2018 Sep; 30(9):1144-1159. PubMed ID: 29389175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the SIRS in compensation cases: an examination of its validity and generalizability.
Rogers R; Payne JW; Berry DT; Granacher RP
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 18679780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for feigned psychiatric symptoms in a forensic sample by using the MMPI-2 and the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology.
Lewis JL; Simcox AM; Berry DT
Psychol Assess; 2002 Jun; 14(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 12056079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A pilot study on the Chinese Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in detecting feigned mental disorders: Simulators classified by using the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms.
Chang YT; Tam WC; Shiah YJ; Chiang SK
Psych J; 2017 Sep; 6(3):175-184. PubMed ID: 28613018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection strategies for malingering with the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test: a confirmatory factor analysis of its underlying dimensions.
Vitacco MJ; Jackson RL; Rogers R; Neumann CS; Miller HA; Gabel J
Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 18258736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The SIMS Screen for feigned mental disorders: the development of detection-based scales.
Rogers R; Robinson EV; Gillard ND
Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(4):455-66. PubMed ID: 25060144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of the Miller forensic assessment of symptoms test in psychiatric inpatients.
Veazey CH; Wagner AL; Hays JR; Miller HA
Psychol Rep; 2005 Jun; 96(3 Pt 1):771-4. PubMed ID: 16050637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New and improved? A comparison of the original and revised versions of the structured interview of reported symptoms.
Green D; Rosenfeld B; Belfi B
Assessment; 2013 Apr; 20(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 23242218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
