103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27046557)
1. Development of a Soft Tissue Elastography Robotic Arm (STiERA).
Dargar S; Akyildiz AC; De S
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 220():77-83. PubMed ID: 27046557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of viscous and elastic properties of sub-wavelength layered soft tissues using shear wave spectroscopy: theoretical framework and in vitro experimental validation.
Nguyen TM; Couade M; Bercoff J; Tanter M
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Nov; 58(11):2305-15. PubMed ID: 22083764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A hand-held probe for vibro-elastography.
Rivaz H; Rohling R
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):613-20. PubMed ID: 16685897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance elastography using an air ball-actuator.
Numano T; Kawabata Y; Mizuhara K; Washio T; Nitta N; Homma K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jul; 31(6):939-46. PubMed ID: 23602728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of oil-in-gelatin phantoms for viscoelasticity measurement in ultrasound shear wave elastography.
Nguyen MM; Zhou S; Robert JL; Shamdasani V; Xie H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 24139915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A New Class of Phantom Materials for Poroelastography Imaging Techniques.
Chaudhry A; Yazdi IK; Kongari R; Tasciotti E; Righetti R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 May; 42(5):1230-8. PubMed ID: 26806439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasound-based transient elastography compared to magnetic resonance elastography in soft tissue-mimicking gels.
Oudry J; Vappou J; Choquet P; Willinger R; Sandrin L; Constantinesco A
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(22):6979-90. PubMed ID: 19887718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Convertible pneumatic actuator for magnetic resonance elastography of the brain.
Latta P; Gruwel ML; Debergue P; Matwiy B; Sboto-Frankenstein UN; Tomanek B
Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 29(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 20833495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated Compression Device for Viscoelasticity Imaging.
Nabavizadeh A; Kinnick RR; Bayat M; Amador C; Urban MW; Alizad A; Fatemi M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Jul; 64(7):1535-1546. PubMed ID: 28113299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In Situ Mechanical Characterization of Multilayer Soft Tissue Using Ultrasound Imaging.
Dargar S; Akyildiz AC; De S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2595-2606. PubMed ID: 28026748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optical palpation: optical coherence tomography-based tactile imaging using a compliant sensor.
Kennedy KM; Es'haghian S; Chin L; McLaughlin RA; Sampson DD; Kennedy BF
Opt Lett; 2014 May; 39(10):3014-7. PubMed ID: 24978261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A quantitative comparison of modulus images obtained using nanoindentation with strain elastograms.
Srinivasan S; Krouskop T; Ophir J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 30(7):899-918. PubMed ID: 15313323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging of mechanical deformations.
Koder G; Serša I
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 34(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 26523647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of tomosynthesis elastography in a breast-mimicking phantom.
Engelken FJ; Sack I; Klatt D; Fischer T; Fallenberg EM; Bick U; Diekmann F
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2169-73. PubMed ID: 21724357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound-stimulated vibro-acoustography for high-resolution differentiation based on viscoelastic properties of tissue mimicking phantoms.
Maccabi A; Arshi A; Garritano J; Saddik G; Kohanbash E; Tajudeen BA; St John M; Grundfest WS; Taylor ZD
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 196():262-4. PubMed ID: 24732519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic palpation and mechanical property characterization for abnormal tissue localization.
Ahn B; Kim Y; Oh CK; Kim J
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2012 Sep; 50(9):961-71. PubMed ID: 22772733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An integrated system for real-time detection of stiff masses with a single compression.
Fahmy AS; Krieger A; Osman NF
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 53(7):1286-93. PubMed ID: 16830933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new method for the visualization and quantification of internal skin elasticity by ultrasound imaging.
Osanai O; Ohtsuka M; Hotta M; Kitaharai T; Takema Y
Skin Res Technol; 2011 Aug; 17(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 21348895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Study of ultrasound stiffness imaging methods using tissue mimicking phantoms.
Manickam K; Machireddy RR; Seshadri S
Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):621-31. PubMed ID: 24083832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel ultrasound indentation system for measuring biomechanical properties of in vivo soft tissue.
Han L; Noble JA; Burcher M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Jun; 29(6):813-23. PubMed ID: 12837497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
