These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27048118)
1. Interobserver variability and positive predictive value for ultrasonographic BI-RADS categories requiring pathohistological evaluation. Dobrosavljevic A; Milosevic Z; Plesinac S; Dmitrović A; Jankovic A; Nadrljanski M; Rakic S; Pazin V; Raznatovic SJ; Jurisic A Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2016; 37(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 27048118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency of Categories 4 and 5 of the Second Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Diagnosing Breast Lesions. Zou X; Wang J; Lan X; Lin Q; Han F; Liu L; Li A Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2065-71. PubMed ID: 27262521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subcategorization of Ultrasonographic BI-RADS Category 4: Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy in Diagnosing Breast Lesions and Influence of Clinical Factors on Positive Predictive Value. He P; Cui LG; Chen W; Yang RL Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 May; 45(5):1253-1258. PubMed ID: 30799123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China. Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Wang H; Luo BM; Guo SL; Zhou Q; Xue ES; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Wang HQ; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S26-S34. PubMed ID: 32768352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction for Breast Cancer in BI-RADS Category 4 Lesion Categorized by Age and Breast Composition of Women in Songklanagarind Hospital. Noonpradej S; Wangkulangkul P; Woodtichartpreecha P; Laohawiriyakamol S Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 Feb; 22(2):531-536. PubMed ID: 33639670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simple rules for ultrasonographic subcategorization of BI-RADS®-US 4 breast masses. Jales RM; Sarian LO; Torresan R; Marussi EF; Alvares BR; Derchain S Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1231-5. PubMed ID: 23540948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5. Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation. Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound. Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subcategorization of ultrasonographic BI-RADS category 4: positive predictive value and clinical factors affecting it. Yoon JH; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Kwak JY; Kim EK Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 May; 37(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 21458145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Abdullah N; Mesurolle B; El-Khoury M; Kao E Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):665-72. PubMed ID: 19567644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of the US BI-RADS final assessment following mastectomy: BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions. Gweon HM; Son EJ; Youk JH; Kim JA; Chung J Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 22302210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Analysis of the positive predictive value of the subcategories of BI-RADS(®) 4 lesions: preliminary results in 880 lesions]. Torres-Tabanera M; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Villar-Castaño P; Sánchez-Gómez SM; Cobo-Soler J; Montoro-Martos EE; Sainz-Miranda M Radiologia; 2012; 54(6):520-31. PubMed ID: 21924441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multiparametric classification system for lesions detected by breast magnetic resonance imaging. Istomin A; Masarwah A; Okuma H; Sutela A; Vanninen R; Sudah M Eur J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 132():109322. PubMed ID: 33045483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography and the ultrasound BI-RADS lexicon of breast lesions. Park CS; Kim SH; Jung NY; Choi JJ; Kang BJ; Jung HS Breast Cancer; 2015 Mar; 22(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 23584596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications. Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Choi CH; Kim EK Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1491-8. PubMed ID: 22173328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of BI-RADS Ultrasound Subcategories 4A to 4C in Predicting Breast Cancer. Spinelli Varella MA; Teixeira da Cruz J; Rauber A; Varella IS; Fleck JF; Moreira LF Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):e507-e511. PubMed ID: 29066139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The value of ultrasound classification in BI-RADS category 4 of breast complex cystic masses]. Yao JP; Niu LJ; Wang Y; Geng CY; Chang Q; Chen Y; Zhu L Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 40(9):672-675. PubMed ID: 30293391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]