BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27048417)

  • 1. Distinct breast cancer characteristics between screen- and self-detected breast cancers recorded in the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry.
    Iwamoto T; Kumamaru H; Miyata H; Tomotaki A; Niikura N; Kawai M; Anan K; Hayashi N; Masuda S; Tsugawa K; Aogi K; Ishida T; Masuoka H; Iijima K; Matsuoka J; Doihara H; Kinoshita T; Nakamura S; Tokuda Y
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Apr; 156(3):485-494. PubMed ID: 27048417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of clinical-pathological characteristics between symptomatic and interval breast cancer.
    Meshkat B; Prichard RS; Al-Hilli Z; Bass GA; Quinn C; O'Doherty A; Rothwell J; Geraghty J; Evoy D; McDermott EW
    Breast; 2015 Jun; 24(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 25771080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characteristics and behaviour of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison with symptomatic patients.
    Koh VC; Lim JC; Thike AA; Cheok PY; Thu MM; Tan VK; Tan BK; Ong KW; Ho GH; Tan WJ; Tan Y; Salahuddin AS; Busmanis I; Chong AP; Iqbal J; Thilagaratnam S; Wong JS; Tan PH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jul; 152(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 26077641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The method of detection of ductal carcinoma in situ has no therapeutic implications: results of a population-based cohort study.
    Elshof LE; Schaapveld M; Rutgers EJ; Schmidt MK; de Munck L; van Leeuwen FE; Wesseling J
    Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Mar; 19(1):26. PubMed ID: 28274272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The frequency of presentation and clinico-pathological characteristics of symptomatic versus screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    Barnes NL; Dimopoulos N; Williams KE; Howe M; Bundred NJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Mar; 40(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 24433818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Nationwide breast cancer screening fully accomplished; results from the implementation phase 1990-1997. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening].
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(23):1124-9. PubMed ID: 10876708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.
    Miglioretti DL; Zhu W; Kerlikowske K; Sprague BL; Onega T; Buist DS; Henderson LM; Smith RA;
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Nov; 1(8):1069-77. PubMed ID: 26501844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incidence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in a screening program by age: should older women continue screening?
    Erbas B; Amos A; Fletcher A; Kavanagh AM; Gertig DM
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Oct; 13(10):1569-73. PubMed ID: 15466971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The financial impact of a breast cancer detected within and outside of screening: lessons from the Australian Lifepool cohort.
    Saxby K; Nickson C; Mann GB; Velentzis L; Bromley HL; Procopio P; Canfell K; Petrie D
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2020 Jun; 44(3):219-226. PubMed ID: 32311194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The distribution of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) grade in 4232 women and its impact on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening.
    van Luijt PA; Heijnsdijk EA; Fracheboud J; Overbeek LI; Broeders MJ; Wesseling J; den Heeten GJ; de Koning HJ
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 May; 18(1):47. PubMed ID: 27160733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer and trends in the management of breast cancer patients in Japan: Based on the Breast Cancer Registry of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society between 2004 and 2011.
    Kurebayashi J; Miyoshi Y; Ishikawa T; Saji S; Sugie T; Suzuki T; Takahashi S; Nozaki M; Yamashita H; Tokuda Y; Nakamura S
    Breast Cancer; 2015 May; 22(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 25758809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and interval breast cancer in a population-based cancer registry study.
    Musolino A; Michiara M; Conti GM; Boggiani D; Zatelli M; Palleschi D; Bella MA; Sgargi P; Di Blasio B; Ardizzoni A
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jul; 30(19):2362-8. PubMed ID: 22585698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pathological and biological differences between screen-detected and interval ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    de Roos MA; van der Vegt B; de Vries J; Wesseling J; de Bock GH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Jul; 14(7):2097-104. PubMed ID: 17453296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Proportion of breast cancer in women aged 50 to 69 years from Girona, Spain, according to detection method].
    Puig-Vives M; Osca-Gelis G; Camprubí-Font C; Vilardell ML; Izquierdo A; Marcos-Gragera R
    Med Clin (Barc); 2014 Oct; 143(7):300-2. PubMed ID: 24378145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends in incidence and tumour grade in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
    Luiten JD; Voogd AC; Luiten EJT; Duijm LEM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(1):307-314. PubMed ID: 28748346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screen detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and subsequent incidence of invasive interval breast cancers: a retrospective population-based study.
    Duffy SW; Dibden A; Michalopoulos D; Offman J; Parmar D; Jenkins J; Collins B; Robson T; Scorfield S; Green K; Hall C; Liao XH; Ryan M; Johnson F; Stevens G; Kearins O; Sellars S; Patnick J
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Jan; 17(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 26655422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic and clinical characteristics of different phenotypes of screen-detected and interval breast cancers in a nationwide screening program.
    Baré M; Torà N; Salas D; Sentís M; Ferrer J; Ibáñez J; Zubizarreta R; Sarriugarte G; Barata T; Domingo L; Castells X; Sala M
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Nov; 154(2):403-15. PubMed ID: 26531756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. First epidemiological analysis of breast cancer incidence and tumor characteristics after implementation of population-based digital mammography screening.
    Weigel S; Batzler WU; Decker T; Hense HW; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2009 Dec; 181(12):1144-50. PubMed ID: 19859859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-grade screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ progresses more slowly than high-grade lesions: evidence from an international multi-centre study.
    Ponti A; Ronco G; Lynge E; Tomatis M; Anttila A; Ascunce N; Broeders M; Bulliard JL; Castellano I; Fitzpatrick P; Frigerio A; Hofvind S; Májek O; Segnan N; Taplin S;
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Oct; 177(3):761-765. PubMed ID: 31250357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Potential impact of USPSTF recommendations on early diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Aragon R; Morgan J; Wong JH; Lum S
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3137-42. PubMed ID: 21947591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.