193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27048510)
1. Phonological similarity in working memory span tasks.
Chow M; Macnamara BN; Conway AR
Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):937-49. PubMed ID: 27048510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Word length and phonological similarity effects in simple, complex, and delayed serial recall tasks: implications for working memory.
Tehan G; Hendry L; Kocinski D
Memory; 2001; 9(4-6):333-48. PubMed ID: 11594356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phonological similarity effects in simple and complex span tasks.
Macnamara BN; Moore AB; Conway AR
Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1174-86. PubMed ID: 21503805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Covert retrieval in working memory impacts the phenomenological characteristics remembered during episodic memory.
Loaiza VM; Borovanska BM
Conscious Cogn; 2018 Jan; 57():20-32. PubMed ID: 29156216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interference between maintenance and processing in working memory: the effect of item-distractor similarity in complex span.
Oberauer K; Farrell S; Jarrold C; Pasiecznik K; Greaves M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):665-85. PubMed ID: 22141748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phonological similarity effect in complex span task.
Camos V; Mora G; Barrouillet P
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(10):1927-50. PubMed ID: 23419012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interfering with free recall of words: Detrimental effects of phonological competition.
Fernandes MA; Wammes JD; Priselac S; Moscovitch M
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Sep; 90():59-71. PubMed ID: 27174519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model.
Conway AR; Engle RW
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1994 Dec; 123(4):354-73. PubMed ID: 7996121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The interaction of concreteness and phonological similarity in verbal working memory.
Acheson DJ; Postle BR; Macdonald MC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):17-36. PubMed ID: 20053042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intelligence as the efficiency of cue-driven retrieval from secondary memory.
Liesefeld HR; Hoffmann E; Wentura D
Memory; 2016; 24(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 25626154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The phonological-similarity effect differentiates between two working memory tasks.
MacAndrew DK; Klatzky RL; Fiez JA; McClelland JL; Becke JT
Psychol Sci; 2002 Sep; 13(5):465-8. PubMed ID: 12219815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Verbal working memory encodes phonological and semantic information differently.
Kowialiewski B; Krasnoff J; Mizrak E; Oberauer K
Cognition; 2023 Apr; 233():105364. PubMed ID: 36584522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.
Meltzer JA; Rose NS; Deschamps T; Leigh RC; Panamsky L; Silberberg A; Madani N; Links KA
Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):307-29. PubMed ID: 26374330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory.
Bunting M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):183-196. PubMed ID: 16569140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The development of memory maintenance: children's use of phonological rehearsal and attentional refreshment in working memory tasks.
Tam H; Jarrold C; Baddeley AD; Sabatos-DeVito M
J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Nov; 107(3):306-24. PubMed ID: 20576275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The stability of working memory: do previous tasks influence complex span?
Healey MK; Hasher L; Danilova E
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):573-85. PubMed ID: 21767041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Forgetting from working memory: does novelty encoding matter?
Plancher G; Barrouillet P
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):110-25. PubMed ID: 22563635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of levels of processing on recall from working memory and delayed recall tasks.
Loaiza VM; McCabe DP; Youngblood JL; Rose NS; Myerson J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1258-63. PubMed ID: 21707214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reification of phonological storage.
Macken WJ; Jones DM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1279-88; discussion 1301-6. PubMed ID: 14578084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does semantic long-term memory impact refreshing in verbal working memory?
Camos V; Mora G; Oftinger AL; Mariz Elsig S; Schneider P; Vergauwe E
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1664-1682. PubMed ID: 30299130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
