193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27048510)
21. Overlap of phonetic features as a determinant of the between-stream phonological similarity effect.
Eagan DE; Chein JM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):473-81. PubMed ID: 21928935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
Larsen JD; Baddeley A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Interpreting potential markers of storage and rehearsal: Implications for studies of verbal short-term memory and neuropsychological cases.
Wang X; Logie RH; Jarrold C
Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):910-21. PubMed ID: 26968712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Long-term semantic representations moderate the effect of attentional refreshing on episodic memory.
Loaiza VM; Duperreault KA; Rhodes MG; McCabe DP
Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):274-80. PubMed ID: 24928092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The hard fall effect: high working memory capacity leads to a higher, but less robust short-term memory performance.
Thomassin N; Gonthier C; Guerraz M; Roulin JL
Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 25384644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The role of semantic representations in verbal working memory.
Loaiza VM; Camos V
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jun; 44(6):863-881. PubMed ID: 29648869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interference between storage and processing in working memory: Feature overwriting, not similarity-based competition.
Oberauer K
Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):346-57. PubMed ID: 19246349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Interpolated retrieval effects on list isolation: Individual differences in working memory capacity.
Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Kane MJ
Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):619-642. PubMed ID: 30725377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of working memory loads on immediate and long-term sentence recall.
Pham T; Archibald LMD
Memory; 2023 Jan; 31(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 36107807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.
Lobley KJ; Baddeley AD; Gathercole SE
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Nov; 58(8):1462-78. PubMed ID: 16365950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Issues with the SIMPLE model: comment on Brown, Neath, and Chater (2007).
Murdock B
Psychol Rev; 2008 Jul; 115(3):779-80; discussion 781-5. PubMed ID: 18729602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Phonological similarity in working memory.
Copeland DE; Radvansky GA
Mem Cognit; 2001 Jul; 29(5):774-6. PubMed ID: 11531232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Attentional refreshing moderates the word frequency effect in immediate and delayed recall tasks.
Abadie M; Camos V
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):127-136. PubMed ID: 29756215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Phonological, visual, and semantic coding strategies and children's short-term picture memory span.
Henry LA; Messer D; Luger-Klein S; Crane L
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):2033-53. PubMed ID: 22512409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Investigating the roles of phonological and semantic memory in sentence recall.
Alloway TP
Memory; 2007 Aug; 15(6):605-15. PubMed ID: 17654276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Modality independence of order coding in working memory: Evidence from cross-modal order interference at recall.
Vandierendonck A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):161-79. PubMed ID: 25801664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Contextual support for children's recall within working memory.
Roome HE; Towse JN; Crespo-Llado MM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1364-1378. PubMed ID: 30239274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. On the sources of forgetting in working memory: The test of competing hypotheses.
Barrouillet P; Uittenhove K; Lucidi A; Langerock N
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1714-1733. PubMed ID: 28726552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Is the phonological similarity effect in working memory due to proactive interference?
Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Quinlan PT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1312-1316. PubMed ID: 29648863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Hebb repetition effect in simple and complex memory span.
Oberauer K; Jones T; Lewandowsky S
Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):852-65. PubMed ID: 25712915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
