These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27048510)

  • 41. The effect of working memory load on semantic illusions: what the phonological loop and central executive have to contribute.
    Büttner AC
    Memory; 2012; 20(8):882-90. PubMed ID: 22897231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. What makes working memory traces stable over time?
    Jarjat G; Hoareau V; Plancher G; Hot P; Lemaire B; Portrat S
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):149-160. PubMed ID: 29744891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Phonological short-term store impairment after cerebellar lesion: a single case study.
    Chiricozzi FR; Clausi S; Molinari M; Leggio MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):1940-53. PubMed ID: 18342342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Control of information in working memory: Encoding and removal of distractors in the complex-span paradigm.
    Oberauer K; Lewandowsky S
    Cognition; 2016 Nov; 156():106-128. PubMed ID: 27552059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Phonological recoding under articulatory suppression.
    Norris D; Butterfield S; Hall J; Page MPA
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Feb; 46(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 28895111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An empirical test of the independence between declarative and procedural working memory in Oberauer's (2009) theory.
    Barrouillet P; Corbin L; Dagry I; Camos V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1035-40. PubMed ID: 25504458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A re-evaluation of the phonological similarity effect in adults' short-term memory of words and nonwords.
    Lian A; Karisen PJ; Winsvold B
    Memory; 2001; 9(4-6):281-99. PubMed ID: 11594352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The ineluctable modality of the audible: perceptual determinants of auditory verbal short-term memory.
    Maidment DW; Macken WJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):989-97. PubMed ID: 22468724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Acoustic interference in a recognition task.
    Lutz J; Wuensch KL
    J Gen Psychol; 1989 Oct; 116(4):371-84. PubMed ID: 2592957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Interference within the focus of attention: working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance.
    Shipstead Z; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):277-89. PubMed ID: 22612165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. On the role of the supramarginal gyrus in phonological processing and verbal working memory: evidence from rTMS studies.
    Deschamps I; Baum SR; Gracco VL
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():39-46. PubMed ID: 24184438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Modulating the interference effect on spatial working memory by applying transcranial direct current stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
    Wu YJ; Tseng P; Chang CF; Pai MC; Hsu KS; Lin CC; Juan CH
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Nov; 91():87-94. PubMed ID: 25265321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Exploration of a 'double-jeopardy' hypothesis within working memory profiles for children with specific language impairment.
    Briscoe J; Rankin PM
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(2):236-50. PubMed ID: 18821159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The semantic category-based grouping in the Multiple Identity Tracking task.
    Wei L; Zhang X; Li Z; Liu J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):118-133. PubMed ID: 28956323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Effect of a Verbal Concurrent Task on Visual Precision in Working Memory.
    Berry EDJ; Allen RJ; Waterman AH; Logie RH
    Exp Psychol; 2019 Jan; 66(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 30777515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Visual similarity at encoding and retrieval in an item recognition task.
    Mate J; Baqués J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1277-84. PubMed ID: 19235099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Short- and long-term memory tasks predict working memory performance, and vice versa.
    Neath I; Saint-Aubin J; Bireta TJ; Gabel AJ; Hudson CG; Surprenant AM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Jun; 73(2):79-93. PubMed ID: 30556715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: is there a detrimental effect on order information?
    Saint-Aubin J; Poirier M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 May; 52(2):367-94. PubMed ID: 10428684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.