These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27048550)

  • 1. [Comparison of two visual acuity tests in school enrolment examinations : Tumbling E test versus Freiburg visual acuity test].
    Bach M; Reuter M; Lagrèze WA
    Ophthalmologe; 2016 Aug; 113(8):684-9. PubMed ID: 27048550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Freiburg Acuity Test in Preschool Children: Testability, Test-Retest Variability, and Comparison With LEA Symbols.
    Farassat N; Jehle V; Heinrich SP; Lagrèze WA; Bach M
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 Mar; 13(3):14. PubMed ID: 38502142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Establishing Prediction Intervals for the SpeedWheel Acuity Test in Adults and Children.
    Luethy ML; Schötzau A; Palmowski-Wolfe A
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2021 Apr; 238(4):488-492. PubMed ID: 33853189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual acuities "hand motion" and "counting fingers" can be quantified with the freiburg visual acuity test.
    Schulze-Bonsel K; Feltgen N; Burau H; Hansen L; Bach M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1236-40. PubMed ID: 16505064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resolving the clinical acuity categories "hand motion" and "counting fingers" using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT).
    Lange C; Feltgen N; Junker B; Schulze-Bonsel K; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 247(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 18766368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Visual acuity measured via the Freiburg visual acuity test (FVT), Bailey Lovie chart and Landolt Ring chart].
    Wesemann W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Sep; 219(9):660-7. PubMed ID: 12410466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Visual acuity testing in pre-school children: a comparison between the Sheridan-Gardiner test and the Räder (broken wheel) test].
    Mildenberger I; Schwabe R; Schiefer U
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Jul; 221(7):577-82. PubMed ID: 15273913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of visual acuity charts in young adults and patients with diabetic retinopathy.
    Plainis S; Kontadakis G; Feloni E; Giannakopoulou T; Tsilimbaris MK; Pallikaris IG; Moschandreas J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 90(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 23314130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A reassessment and comparison of the Landolt C and tumbling E charts in managing amblyopia.
    Lai YH; Wu HJ; Chang SJ
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):18277. PubMed ID: 34521954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test-variability unchanged by post-hoc re-analysis.
    Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 245(7):965-71. PubMed ID: 17219125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual Acuity Testing: Feedback Affects Neither Outcome nor Reproducibility, but Leaves Participants Happier.
    Bach M; Schäfer K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147803. PubMed ID: 26824693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual acuity norms in young children.
    Simons K
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1983; 28(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 6359515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Visual acuity screening tests during the school years: how often and which threshold to chose?].
    Woringer V
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 May; 117(5):429-32. PubMed ID: 9273653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application.
    Rhiu S; Lee HJ; Goo YS; Cho K; Kim JH
    Telemed J E Health; 2016 Mar; 22(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 26280910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of visual acuity measurement with Landolt rings versus numbers].
    Rohrschneider K; Spittler AR; Bach M
    Ophthalmologe; 2019 Nov; 116(11):1058-1063. PubMed ID: 30927070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of optical defocus on the legibility of the Tumbling-E and Landolt-C.
    Reich LN; Ekabutr M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 79(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 12086306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Screening of selected parameters of visual system in children at the age of 6 to 10 in Great Poland area].
    Pieczyrak D; Miśkowiak B
    Klin Oczna; 2010; 112(4-6):37-41. PubMed ID: 20825075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Screening of selected parameters of visual system in children at the age of 6 to 10 in Great Poland area].
    Pieczyrak D; Miśkowiak B
    Klin Oczna; 2010; 112(1-3):37-41. PubMed ID: 20572501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of visual acuity in preschool children as measured with Landolt C and Tumbling E charts.
    Lai YH; Wang HZ; Hsu HT
    J AAPOS; 2011 Jun; 15(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 21777798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of letter separation on computerised visual acuity measurements: comparison with the gold standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
    Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Brown G; Robson C
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 20444125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.