285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27049540)
1. How Prevalent Are Potentially Illegal Questions During Residency Interviews? A Follow-up Study of Applicants to All Specialties in the National Resident Matching Program.
Hern HG; Trivedi T; Alter HJ; Wills CP
Acad Med; 2016 Nov; 91(11):1546-1553. PubMed ID: 27049540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How prevalent are potentially illegal questions during residency interviews?
Hern HG; Alter HJ; Wills CP; Snoey ER; Simon BC
Acad Med; 2013 Aug; 88(8):1116-21. PubMed ID: 23807097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Have We Come as Far as We Had Hoped? Discrimination in the Residency Interview.
Hessel K; DiPasco P; Kilgore L; Shelley C; Perry A; Wagner J
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(6):939-945. PubMed ID: 28483440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neurosurgery Resident Interviews: The Prevalence and Impact of Inappropriate and Potentially Illegal Questions.
Limoges N; Zuckerman SL; Chambless LB; Benzil DL; Cruz A; Borden JH; Durham S
Neurosurgery; 2021 Jun; 89(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 33733664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prevalence, Bias, and Rank List Impact of Illegal Questions in Surgical Specialty Residency Interviews.
Theiss LM; Prather JC; Porterfield JR; Corey B; Chen H; McGwin G; Johnson MD; Theiss SM
J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 34400121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The National Resident Matching Program Code of Conduct: What Is the Perceived Degree of Compliance During the Urology Match Process?
Sebesta EM; Lipsky MJ; Nunez M; Cooper KL; Badalato GM
Urology; 2018 Dec; 122():37-43. PubMed ID: 29935263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emergency medicine residency applicant perceptions of unethical recruiting practices and illegal questioning in the match.
Thurman RJ; Katz E; Carter W; Han J; Kayala E; McCoin N; Storrow AB
Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Jun; 16(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 19388912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrity of the National Resident Matching Program for Radiation Oncology: National Survey of Applicant Experiences.
Holliday EB; Thomas CR; Kusano AS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(3):525-31. PubMed ID: 25936811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How well will you FIT? Use of a modified MMI to assess applicants' compatibility with an emergency medicine residency program.
Min AA; Leetch A; Nuño T; Fiorello AB
Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():29587. PubMed ID: 26842824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Applicants' opinions about the selection process for oral and maxillofacial surgery programs.
Marciani RD; Smith TA; Heaton LJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 May; 61(5):608-14. PubMed ID: 12730841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Asking for a commitment: violations during the 2007 match and the effect on applicant rank lists.
Hern HG; Johnson B; Alter HJ; Wills CP; Snoey ER; Simon BC
West J Emerg Med; 2015 Mar; 16(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 25834683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Residency Match: Interview Experiences, Postinterview Communication, and Associated Distress.
Berriochoa C; Reddy CA; Dorsey S; Campbell S; Poblete-Lopez C; Schlenk R; Spencer A; Lee J; Eagleton M; Tendulkar RD
J Grad Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 10(4):403-408. PubMed ID: 30154970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The prevalence and nature of postinterview communications between residency programs and applicants during the match.
Jena AB; Arora VM; Hauer KE; Durning S; Borges N; Oriol N; Elnicki DM; Fagan MJ; Harrell HE; Torre D; Prochaska M; Meltzer DO; Reddy S
Acad Med; 2012 Oct; 87(10):1434-42. PubMed ID: 22914523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interview experience, post-interview communication, and gender-based differences in the integrated vascular surgery residency match.
Fereydooni A; Ramirez JL; Morrow KL; Sorondo S; Lee JT; Coleman DM; Chandra V
J Vasc Surg; 2022 Jan; 75(1):316-322.e2. PubMed ID: 34197947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perception of medical students and residents about virtual interviews for residency applications in the United States.
Seifi A; Mirahmadizadeh A; Eslami V
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238239. PubMed ID: 32866220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Potentially discriminatory questions during residency interviews: frequency and effects on residents' ranking of programs in the national resident matching program.
Santen SA; Davis KR; Brady DW; Hemphill RR
J Grad Med Educ; 2010 Sep; 2(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 21976079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discriminatory questions asked during residency programme interviews: perspective from both interviewers and applicants.
Harkin E; Murphy M; Liskutin T; Nystrom L; Wu K; Schiff A
Postgrad Med J; 2021 Jun; 97(1148):355-362. PubMed ID: 32660961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Canadian Urology Fair: a model for minimizing the financial and academic costs of the residency selection process.
Grober ED; Matsumoto ED; Jewett MA; Chin JL;
Can J Surg; 2003 Dec; 46(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 14680354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peri-Interview Communication in the Otolaryngology Residency Match: The Applicant Perspective.
Masciello M; Malekzadeh S
Laryngoscope; 2021 Jan; 131(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 32065402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gender Based Differences in Discriminatory Questions Asked of Urology Applicants during Residency Interviews.
Keeter MK; Singal A; Demzik A; Roston A; Shah N; Kielb SJ
Urol Pract; 2019 Jan; 6(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 37312369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
