144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27049875)
1. Prospective Evaluation of the Effect of Thigh Dissection for Removal of Transobturator Mid Urethral Slings on Refractory Thigh Pain.
King AB; Tenggardjaja C; Goldman HB
J Urol; 2016 Oct; 196(4):1207-12. PubMed ID: 27049875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term patient satisfaction after retropubic and transobturator mid-urethral slings for female stress urinary incontinence.
Al-Zahrani AA; Gajewski J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1180-5. PubMed ID: 27279335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical Pain After Transobturator and Retropubic Midurethral Sling Placement.
Thomas TN; Siff LN; Jelovsek JE; Barber M
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 130(1):118-125. PubMed ID: 28594776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Complications of mid urethral slings: important outcomes for future clinical trials.
Daneshgari F; Kong W; Swartz M
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1890-7. PubMed ID: 18801499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Removal of transobturator midurethral sling for refractory thigh pain.
Wolter CE; Starkman JS; Scarpero HM; Dmochowski RR
Urology; 2008 Aug; 72(2):461.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18314169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Thigh exploration for excision of a transobturator sling.
Murphy AM; Goldman HB
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 May; 28(5):793-794. PubMed ID: 28213795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Obturator foramen dissection for excision of symptomatic transobturator mesh.
Reynolds WS; Kit LC; Kaufman MR; Karram M; Bales GT; Dmochowski RR
J Urol; 2012 May; 187(5):1680-4. PubMed ID: 22425123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study.
Jurakova M; Huser M; Belkov I; Janku P; Hudecek R; Stourac P; Jarkovsky J; Ventruba P
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):791-6. PubMed ID: 26630947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of Autologous Fascia Pubovaginal Sling for Patients with Transvaginal Mesh Related Complications Requiring Mesh Removal.
McCoy O; Vaughan T; Nickles SW; Ashley M; MacLachlan LS; Ginsberg D; Rovner E
J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):484-9. PubMed ID: 26997314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transobturator vs single-incision suburethral mini-slings for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: early postoperative pain and 3-year follow-up.
Neuman M; Sosnovski V; Kais M; Ophir E; Bornstein J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(6):769-73. PubMed ID: 22024263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Symptom Resolution and Recurrent Urinary Incontinence Following Removal of Painful Midurethral Slings.
Zeng J; Bergersen A; Price E; Callegari M; Austin E; Oduyemi O; Poling K; Hsu CH; Funk J; Twiss C
Urology; 2022 Jan; 159():78-82. PubMed ID: 34474043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Autologous transobturator urethral sling placement for female stress urinary incontinence.
Linder BJ; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2015 Mar; 193(3):991-6. PubMed ID: 25444955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Risk of Recurrent Urinary Incontinence Requiring Surgery After Suburethral Sling Removal for Mesh Complications.
Ramart P; Ackerman AL; Cohen SA; Kim JH; Raz S
Urology; 2017 Aug; 106():203-209. PubMed ID: 28476681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.
Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; de Ridder DJ; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 25168619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Challenges of Multidimensional Outcome Reporting after Suburethral Mid Urethral Sling Removal.
Shakir NA; Wang C; Singla N; Alhalabi F; Christie A; Lemack GE; Zimmern PE
J Urol; 2018 Jun; 199(6):1577-1583. PubMed ID: 29307687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes following repeat mid urethral synthetic sling after failure of the initial sling procedure: rediscovery of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure.
Lee KS; Doo CK; Han DH; Jung BJ; Han JY; Choo MS
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1370-4; discussion 1374. PubMed ID: 17706716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 5-year longitudinal followup after retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings.
Kenton K; Stoddard AM; Zyczynski H; Albo M; Rickey L; Norton P; Wai C; Kraus SR; Sirls LT; Kusek JW; Litman HJ; Chang RP; Richter HE
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 25158274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Analysis of the results of urinary incontinence treatment in women using free suburethral synthetic sling: the experience of 1000 operations].
Kasian GR; Gvozdev MIu; Godunov BN; Prokopovich MA; Pushkar' DIu
Urologiia; 2013; (4):5-11. PubMed ID: 24159756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complications Following the Insertion of Two Synthetic Mid-urethral Slings and Subsequent Removal.
Lee D; Bacsu C; Dillon B; Zimmern PE
Low Urin Tract Symptoms; 2018 Sep; 10(3):259-265. PubMed ID: 28657139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A meta-analysis of the performance of retropubic mid urethral slings versus transobturator mid urethral slings.
Seklehner S; Laudano MA; Xie D; Chughtai B; Lee RK
J Urol; 2015 Mar; 193(3):909-15. PubMed ID: 25281779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
