These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27050343)

  • 21. Corneal Biomechanical Characteristics in Patıents with Behçet Disease.
    Cankaya C; Kalayci BN
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2016; 31(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 25392262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus.
    Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Jardim D; Velarde GC; Nosé W
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):673-9. PubMed ID: 20138369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Diagnostic capacity of the keratoconus match index and keratoconus match probability in subclinical keratoconus.
    Labiris G; Giarmoukakis A; Gatzioufas Z; Sideroudi H; Kozobolis V; Seitz B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 40(6):999-1005. PubMed ID: 24713585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changes in corneal biomechanics in patients with keratoconus after penetrating keratoplasty.
    Yenerel NM; Kucumen RB; Gorgun E
    Cornea; 2010 Nov; 29(11):1247-51. PubMed ID: 20697286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of corneal biomechanics in pre and post-refractive surgery and keratoconic eyes by Ocular Response Analyser.
    Shah S; Laiquzzaman M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Jun; 32(3):129-32; quiz 151. PubMed ID: 19233712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Early biomechanical keratoconus pattern measured with an ocular response analyzer: curve analysis.
    Touboul D; Bénard A; Mahmoud AM; Gallois A; Colin J; Roberts CJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2144-50. PubMed ID: 21978610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure measurement in Marfan patients.
    Kara N; Bozkurt E; Baz O; Altinkaynak H; Dundar H; Yuksel K; Yazici AT; Demirok A; Candan S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Feb; 38(2):309-14. PubMed ID: 22153358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy and keratoconic eyes using dynamic bidirectional applanation device and dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.
    Herber R; Ramm L; Spoerl E; Raiskup F; Pillunat LE; Terai N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jun; 45(6):778-788. PubMed ID: 30902432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using an ocular response analyser to examine aphakic and pseudophakic patients after congenital cataract surgery.
    Simsek T; Soba DO; Tırhış MH; Yılmazbaş P; Öztürk F
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 94(3):e198-203. PubMed ID: 26521752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improved keratoconus detection by ocular response analyzer testing after consideration of corneal thickness as a confounding factor.
    Galletti JG; Pförtner T; Bonthoux FF
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 22230059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Combining ocular response analyzer metrics for corneal biomechanical diagnosis.
    Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Delrivo M; Bonthoux FF; Pförtner T; Galletti JG
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 29(9):596-602. PubMed ID: 23848186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Characteristics After Surface Ablation Refractive Surgery and Novel Lamellar Refractive Surgery.
    Dou R; Wang Y; Xu L; Wu D; Wu W; Li X
    Cornea; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1441-6. PubMed ID: 26226471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin-C on corneal biomechanical features.
    Zare M; Feizi S; Azimzadeh A; Esfandiari H
    Curr Eye Res; 2012 Jun; 37(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 22577762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Corneal biomechanical evaluation in healthy thin corneas compared with matched keratoconus cases.
    Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Velarde GC; Nosé W
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2011; 74(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 21670900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Study on corneal biomechanical properties of suspicious keratoconus patients in corneal topography].
    Zhang YH; Wang Y; Li LY; Zhang L; Wei PH
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 55(6):442-447. PubMed ID: 31189274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Discriminant Value of Custom Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Derivatives in Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
    Luz A; Lopes B; Hallahan KM; Valbon B; Fontes B; Schor P; Dupps WJ; Ambrósio R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 164():14-21. PubMed ID: 26743618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biomechanical and refractive behaviors of keratoconic cornea based on three-dimensional anisotropic hyperelastic models.
    Han Z; Sui X; Zhou D; Zhou C; Ren Q
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 23557227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure in high myopic anisometropia.
    Xu S; Xu A; Tao A; Wang J; Fan F; Lu F
    Eye Contact Lens; 2010 Jul; 36(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 20531203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Corneal biomechanical property measurement with an IOP loading method in keratoconic patients.
    Sergienko NM; Shargorodska IV
    Curr Eye Res; 2014 Oct; 39(10):994-9. PubMed ID: 24654976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Topographic, tomographic and biomechanical corneal changes during pregnancy in patients with keratoconus: a cohort study.
    Naderan M; Jahanrad A
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 95(4):e291-e296. PubMed ID: 27781383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.