186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27050538)
21. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Kuhn S; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Decompression alone versus fusion and Coflex in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease: A network meta-analysis.
Fan Y; Zhu L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Mar; 99(11):e19457. PubMed ID: 32176077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
Cakir B; Carazzo C; Schmidt R; Mattes T; Reichel H; Käfer W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 19455004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Decompression and nonfusion dynamic stabilization for spinal stenosis with degenerative lumbar scoliosis: Clinical article.
Lee SE; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 25084033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I
Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Decompression of lumbar canal stenosis with a bilateral interlaminar versus classic laminectomy technique: a prospective randomized study.
Soliman MAR; Ali A
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E3. PubMed ID: 31042649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Clinical evaluation of interspinous process device Coflex for degenerative disk diseases].
Ni WF; Xu HZ; Zhou Y; Chi YL; Huang QS; Wang XY; Lin Y; Mao FM; Wu LJ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 50(9):776-81. PubMed ID: 23157950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The 2-Level Experience of Interlaminar Stabilization: 5-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Experience Compared to Fusion for the Sustainable Management of Spinal Stenosis.
Simon RB; Dowe C; Grinberg S; Cammisa FP; Abjornson C
Int J Spine Surg; 2018 Aug; 12(4):419-427. PubMed ID: 30276101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Lumbar disc arthroplasty with Maverick disc versus stand-alone interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption trial.
Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1600-11. PubMed ID: 21415812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Two-year follow-up after decompressive surgery with and without implantation of an interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective controlled study.
Richter A; Halm HF; Hauck M; Quante M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Aug; 27(6):336-41. PubMed ID: 22643187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Short-term effectiveness of interlaminar lumbar instrumented fusion through a small incision for lumbar spinal stenosis].
Wang S; Chao J; Wei J; Diaz FG
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 26(6):703-7. PubMed ID: 22792768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization.
Schaeren S; Broger I; Jeanneret B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(18):E636-42. PubMed ID: 18708915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Coflex interspinous process dynamic stabilization for lumbar spinal stenosis: Long-term follow-up.
Du MR; Wei FL; Zhu KL; Song RM; Huan Y; Jia B; Gu JT; Pan LX; Zhou HY; Qian JX; Zhou CP
J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 81():462-468. PubMed ID: 33222963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Short-term clinical results of interspinous dynamic fixation of Coflex for the prevention of adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion].
Zhou SY; Chen XS; Jia LS; Zhu W; Fang L; Cai TY
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 50(9):772-5. PubMed ID: 23157949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Risk for adjacent segment and same segment reoperation after surgery for lumbar stenosis: a subgroup analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).
Radcliff K; Curry P; Hilibrand A; Kepler C; Lurie J; Zhao W; Albert TJ; Weinstein J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):531-9. PubMed ID: 23154835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Coflex interspinous dynamic internal fixation for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].
Chen YH; Xu D; Xu HZ; Chi YL; Wang XY; Huang QS
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Dec; 22(12):902-5. PubMed ID: 20112569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Paradoxical Radiographic Changes of Coflex Interspinous Device with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Lee N; Shin DA; Kim KN; Yoon DH; Ha Y; Shin HC; Yi S
World Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 85():177-84. PubMed ID: 26361324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical analysis in a human cadaveric model of spinous process fixation with an interlaminar allograft spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis: Laboratory investigation.
Pradhan BB; Turner AW; Zatushevsky MA; Cornwall GB; Rajaee SS; Bae HW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):585-93. PubMed ID: 22519928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Spinal fusion combined with dynamic interspinous fixation with Coflex system for lumbar degenerative disease].
Li ZH; Wang SY; Tang H; Ma H; Zhang QL; HoU TS
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2011 Apr; 24(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 21604519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [A comparative study between Coflex interspinous dynamic reconstruction and lumbar 360 degrees fusion in treating single-level degenerative lumbar spinal disorders].
Liu J; Liu H; Li T; Zeng J; Song Y; Liu L; Gong Q
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 25(6):693-8. PubMed ID: 21735783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
