These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27051041)

  • 1. Can we measure patients' perception during dental impressions? The Burdens in Dental Impression-Making Questionnaire - BiDIM-Q.
    Tsirogiannis P; Neophytou S; Reul A; Heydecke G; Reissmann DR
    J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Jan; 61(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 27051041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Burdens in Prosthetic Dentistry Questionnaire (BiPD-Q): development and validation of a patient-based measure for process-related quality of care in prosthetic dentistry.
    Reissmann DR; Hacker T; Farhan D; Heydecke G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(3):250-9. PubMed ID: 23626979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of the Burdens in Oral Surgery Questionnaire (BiOS-Q).
    Reissmann DR; Semmusch J; Farhan D; Smeets R; Heiland M; Heydecke G
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Oct; 40(10):780-7. PubMed ID: 24033878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients' perceived burdens.
    Hacker T; Heydecke G; Reissmann DR
    J Dent; 2015 Jan; 43(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 25446242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scoring and psychometric validation of the Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire (PACT-Q).
    Prins MH; Guillemin I; Gilet H; Gabriel S; Essers B; Raskob G; Kahn SR
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2009 Apr; 7():30. PubMed ID: 19348685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants.
    Wismeijer D; Mans R; van Genuchten M; Reijers HA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Oct; 25(10):1113-8. PubMed ID: 23941118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction.
    Burzynski JA; Firestone AR; Beck FM; Fields HW; Deguchi T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):534-541. PubMed ID: 29602345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients' preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material.
    Sakornwimon N; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 28222872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A survey of U.S. prosthodontists and dental schools on the current materials and methods for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 16359482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
    Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 10709042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of stone casts obtained by different impression materials.
    Faria AC; Rodrigues RC; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 19148382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The arthritic patients' perspective of measuring treatment efficacy: Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) as a quality tool.
    El Miedany Y; El Gaafary M; Youssef S; Ahmed I; Palmer D
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2014; 32(4):547-52. PubMed ID: 24984075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a psychometric scale to assess satisfaction with dental care among Sri Lankans.
    Perera IR; Usgodaarachchi US
    Community Dent Health; 2009 Sep; 26(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 19780355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and Validation of the MiPrep Survey: An Instrument Assessing Patients' Perceived Preparation for Medical Interventions Including Medical Imaging, Radiotherapy, and Surgery.
    Fakes KL; Hall AE; Carey ML; Boyes AW; Symonds M; Evans TJ; Sanson-Fisher RW
    Value Health; 2019 Jun; 22(6):704-711. PubMed ID: 31198188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Ballesteros J; Moral E; Brieva L; Ruiz-Beato E; Prefasi D; Maurino J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 28431587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials.
    Buzayan M; Baig MR; Yunus N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 24278919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring patients' satisfaction with their anti-TNF treatment in severe Crohn's disease: scoring and psychometric validation of the Satisfaction for PAtients in Crohn's diseasE Questionnaire (SPACE-Q(©)).
    Gilet H; Arnould B; Fofana F; Clerson P; Colombel JF; D'Hondt O; Faure P; Hagège H; Nachury M; Nahon S; Tucat G; Vandromme L; Cazala-Telinge I; Thibout E
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2014; 8():1671-81. PubMed ID: 25525343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Handling of Polyvinylsiloxane Versus Polyether for Implant Impressions.
    Farhan D; Lauer W; Heydecke G; Aarabi G; Reissmann DR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 27479351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vinylsiloxanether: a new impression material. Clinical study of implant impressions with vinylsiloxanether versus polyether materials.
    Enkling N; Bayer S; Jöhren P; Mericske-Stern R
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 19793332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.