These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27051172)

  • 1. Comparison of two programs in calculating electron output factors at extended source-surface distances.
    Hu Y; Lambert JA; Wang Y
    J Med Phys; 2016; 41(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 27051172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Output calculation of electron therapy at extended SSD using an improved LBR method.
    Alkhatib HA; Gebreamlak WT; Tedeschi DJ; Mihailidis D; Wright BW; Neglia WJ; Sobash PT; Fontenot JD
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):735-40. PubMed ID: 25652487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electron beam therapy at extended SSDs: an analysis of output correction factors for a Mitsubishi linear accelerator.
    Rajasekar D; Datta NR; Das KJ; Ayyagari S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(18):3301-11. PubMed ID: 12375822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An enhanced sector integration model for output and dose distribution calculation of irregular concave shaped electron beams.
    Gajewski R
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):2966-75. PubMed ID: 19673195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical determination of collimator scatter data for use in Radcalc commercial monitor unit calculation software: Implication for prostate volumetric modulated-arc therapy calculations.
    Richmond N; Tulip R; Walker C
    Med Dosim; 2016; 41(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 26755077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Convolution-based modified Clarkson integration (CMCI) for electron cutout factor calculation.
    Chang J; Lin MH; Lu W; Chen M; Jiang S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 29396894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified sector-integration method for predicting the output factors of electron beams including extended source to surface distance.
    Choi DR; Wolters J; Mason D; Baillie A
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Nov; 45(11):3367-72. PubMed ID: 11098910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A machine learning approach to the accurate prediction of monitor units for a compact proton machine.
    Sun B; Lam D; Yang D; Grantham K; Zhang T; Mutic S; Zhao T
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2243-2251. PubMed ID: 29500818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental verification and clinical implementation of a commercial Monte Carlo electron beam dose calculation algorithm.
    Fragoso M; Pillai S; Solberg TD; Chetty IJ
    Med Phys; 2008 Mar; 35(3):1028-38. PubMed ID: 18404938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the first commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation engine for electron beam treatment planning.
    Cygler JE; Daskalov GM; Chan GH; Ding GX
    Med Phys; 2004 Jan; 31(1):142-53. PubMed ID: 14761030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a Lévy electron energy straggling model for an Elekta Synergy® linear accelerator.
    van Eeden D; Sachse KN; du Plessis FCP
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2020 Oct; 164():109244. PubMed ID: 32819500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of a simple analytical model for in-air outputfactor calculation for SL-15 Philips-Elekta linear accelerator.
    Ali MA; Emam I
    Phys Med; 2005; 21(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 18348845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a new commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beams.
    Vandervoort EJ; Tchistiakova E; La Russa DJ; Cygler JE
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021711. PubMed ID: 24506602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method of scaling the 3D electron pencil-beam dose calculation to obtain accurate monitor units for irregularly-shaped electron beams.
    McNutt TR; Tomé WA
    Med Dosim; 2002; 27(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 12374377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linearity of the dose monitor system at low monitor units.
    Mohr P; Brieger S; Stahl J; Witucki G
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Jun; 183(6):327-31. PubMed ID: 17520187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance Characteristics of an Independent Dose Verification Program for Helical Tomotherapy.
    Chang ICF; Chen J; Yartsev S
    J Med Phys; 2017; 42(3):156-162. PubMed ID: 28974862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Photon output factor calculation from the inverse of the sector-integration equation.
    Sanz DE; Romaguera AL; Acosta NB
    Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1447-53. PubMed ID: 10501043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Independent calculation of monitor units for VMAT and SPORT.
    Chen X; Bush K; Ding A; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):918-24. PubMed ID: 25652504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. I-125 ROPES eye plaque dosimetry: validation of a commercial 3D ophthalmic brachytherapy treatment planning system and independent dose calculation software with GafChromic® EBT3 films.
    Poder J; Corde S
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121709. PubMed ID: 24320495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a commercial VMC++ Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for electron beams using EGSnrc/BEAMnrc simulations and measurements.
    Edimo P; Clermont C; Kwato MG; Vynckier S
    Phys Med; 2009 Sep; 25(3):111-21. PubMed ID: 18722148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.