These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

750 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27051256)

  • 1. Factors Affecting Long-term Myopic Regression after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy for Moderate Myopia.
    Lim SA; Park Y; Cheong YJ; Na KS; Joo CK
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 27051256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictors affecting myopic regression in - 6.0D to - 10.0D myopia after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with femtosecond laser-assisted or mechanical microkeratome-assisted.
    Zhou J; Gu W; Li S; Wu L; Gao Y; Guo X
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):213-225. PubMed ID: 31571091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.
    Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; García-González M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 146(3):357-362. PubMed ID: 18614136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to treat residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Cagil N; Aydin B; Ozturk S; Hasiripi H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):642-7. PubMed ID: 17397737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term visual and refractive outcomes following surface ablation techniques in a large population for myopia correction.
    Kulkarni SV; AlMahmoud T; Priest D; Taylor SE; Mintsioulis G; Jackson WB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):609-19. PubMed ID: 23221080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia.
    Kuryan J; Cheema A; Chuck RS
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 2(2):CD011080. PubMed ID: 28197998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.
    Tobaigy FM; Ghanem RC; Sayegh RR; Hallak JA; Azar DT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):901-8. PubMed ID: 17157575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Femtosecond laser-assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis to correct myopic astigmatism.
    Gros-Otero J; Garcia-Gonzalez M; Teus MA; Iglesias-Iglesias M; Gimenez-Vallejo C
    J Optom; 2018; 11(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 27751694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications.
    Ghadhfan F; Al-Rajhi A; Wagoner MD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2041-8. PubMed ID: 18053901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. LASEK versus LASIK for the correction of moderate myopia.
    Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; Sánchez-Pina JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):605-10. PubMed ID: 17632309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for myopia more than -10.00 diopters].
    Huang P; Liu J; Xia YJ; Zhong YY; Chen YG
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2007 Oct; 39(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 17940568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy versus epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.
    Wen D; Huang J; Li X; Savini G; Feng Y; Lin Q; Wang Q
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014; 42(4):323-33. PubMed ID: 24024483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between femtosecond laser-assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis vs laser subepithelial keratectomy to correct myopia.
    de Benito-Llopis L; Teus MA; Gil-Cazorla R; Drake P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 148(6):830-6.e1. PubMed ID: 19781686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Saeed A; O'Doherty M; O'Doherty J; O'Keefe M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1736-41. PubMed ID: 18812126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Straylight measurements in laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for myopia.
    Lapid-Gortzak R; van der Linden JW; van der Meulen I; Nieuwendaal C; van den Berg T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 36(3):465-71. PubMed ID: 20202546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictors of Myopic Regression for Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted in Situ Keratomileusis Flap Creation with Mechanical Microkeratome and Femtosecond Laser in Low and Moderate Myopia.
    Zhou J; Gao Y; Li S; Gu W; Wu L; Guo X
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 27(3):177-185. PubMed ID: 31878825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of higher-order aberrations after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia using the technolas 217z laser platform.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 18775529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective bilateral comparison of epi-LASIK and LASEK for myopia.
    Hondur A; Bilgihan K; Hasanreisoglu B
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 24(9):928-34. PubMed ID: 19044234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of high myopia.
    Kim JK; Kim SS; Lee HK; Lee IS; Seong GJ; Kim EK; Han SH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jul; 30(7):1405-11. PubMed ID: 15210215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.
    Shen Y; Chen Z; Knorz MC; Li M; Zhao J; Zhou X
    J Refract Surg; 2014 May; 30(5):310-8. PubMed ID: 24904933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.