These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27052431)

  • 21. Positive stereotypes, negative outcomes: Reminders of the positive components of complementary gender stereotypes impair performance in counter-stereotypical tasks.
    Kahalon R; Shnabel N; Becker JC
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2018 Apr; 57(2):482-502. PubMed ID: 29377186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?
    Cheryan S; Ziegler SA; Montoya AK; Jiang L
    Psychol Bull; 2017 Jan; 143(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 27732018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of everyday romantic goal pursuit on women's attitudes toward math and science.
    Park LE; Young AF; Troisi JD; Pinkus RT
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1259-73. PubMed ID: 21617021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Longitudinal stability and change across a year in children's gender stereotypes about four different STEM fields.
    Tang D; Meltzoff AN; Cheryan S; Fan W; Master A
    Dev Psychol; 2024 Jun; 60(6):1109-1130. PubMed ID: 38695824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Meta-lay theories of scientific potential drive underrepresented students' sense of belonging to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
    Rattan A; Savani K; Komarraju M; Morrison MM; Boggs C; Ambady N
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Jul; 115(1):54-75. PubMed ID: 29911882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does Exposure to Counterstereotypical Role Models Influence Girls' and Women's Gender Stereotypes and Career Choices? A Review of Social Psychological Research.
    Olsson M; Martiny SE
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2264. PubMed ID: 30581398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gender-related academic and occupational interests and goals.
    Petersen J; Hyde JS
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2014; 47():43-76. PubMed ID: 25344993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions.
    Wang MT; Degol JL
    Educ Psychol Rev; 2017 Mar; 29(1):119-140. PubMed ID: 28458499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Who Chooses STEM Careers? Using A Relative Cognitive Strength and Interest Model to Predict Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.
    Wang MT; Ye F; Degol JL
    J Youth Adolesc; 2017 Aug; 46(8):1805-1820. PubMed ID: 27975183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Model of Queer STEM Identity in the Workplace.
    Mattheis A; De Arellano DC; Yoder JB
    J Homosex; 2020 Nov; 67(13):1839-1863. PubMed ID: 31082315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. When trying hard isn't natural: women's belonging with and motivation for male-dominated STEM fields as a function of effort expenditure concerns.
    Smith JL; Lewis KL; Hawthorne L; Hodges SD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Feb; 39(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 23187722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceived mathematical ability under challenge: a longitudinal perspective on sex segregation among STEM degree fields.
    Nix S; Perez-Felkner L; Thomas K
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():530. PubMed ID: 26113823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predictors of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics choice options: A meta-analytic path analysis of the social-cognitive choice model by gender and race/ethnicity.
    Lent RW; Sheu HB; Miller MJ; Cusick ME; Penn LT; Truong NN
    J Couns Psychol; 2018 Jan; 65(1):17-35. PubMed ID: 29355343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Motivation of men and women in mathematics and language.
    Vrugt A; Oort FJ; Waardenburg L
    Int J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 44(5):351-9. PubMed ID: 22029613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Which representations of their gender group affect men's orientation towards care? the case of parental leave-taking intentions.
    Scheifele C; Steffens MC; Van Laar C
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260950. PubMed ID: 34860838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Understanding the gender gap: Social cognitive changes during an introductory stem course.
    Hardin EE; Longhurst MO
    J Couns Psychol; 2016 Mar; 63(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 26436723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The changing career trajectories of new parents in STEM.
    Cech EA; Blair-Loy M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Mar; 116(10):4182-4187. PubMed ID: 30782835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Social or Economic Goals? The Professional Goal Orientation of Students Enrolled in STEM and Non-STEM Majors in University.
    Wolter I; Ehrtmann L; Seidel T; Drechsel B
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2065. PubMed ID: 31572263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do Growth Mindsets in Math Benefit Females? Identifying Pathways between Gender, Mindset, and Motivation.
    Degol JL; Wang MT; Zhang Y; Allerton J
    J Youth Adolesc; 2018 May; 47(5):976-990. PubMed ID: 28889203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Role of Prototype Matching in Science Pursuits: Perceptions of Scientists That Are Inaccurate and Diverge From Self-Perceptions Predict Reduced Interest in a Science Career.
    McPherson E; Park B; Ito TA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Jun; 44(6):881-898. PubMed ID: 29405846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.