141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27053823)
1. Multi-beam X-ray source breast tomosynthesis reconstruction with different algorithms.
Zhou W; Qian X; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2010; 7622():76220H. PubMed ID: 27053823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Goodsitt MM; Hadjiiski LM; Ge J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3781-95. PubMed ID: 17089843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of digital tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms used to reduce metal artifacts for arthroplasty: A phantom study.
Gomi T; Sakai R; Goto M; Hara H; Watanabe Y; Umeda T
Phys Med; 2017 Oct; 42():28-38. PubMed ID: 29173918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of reconstruction algorithms for a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
Hu Z; Chen Z; Zhou C; Hong X; Chen J; Zhang Q; Jiang C; Ge Y; Yang Y; Liu X; Zheng H; Li Z; Liang D
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(6):1157-1169. PubMed ID: 32925159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers.
Van de Sompel D; Brady SM; Boone J
Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 20713313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Realistic Breast Phantom Proposal for 3D Image Reconstruction in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Polat A; Kumrular RK
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338221104567. PubMed ID: 36071652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of back projection methods for breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction.
Zhou W; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25384538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An object-oriented simulator for 3D digital breast tomosynthesis imaging system.
Seyyedi S; Cengiz K; Kamasak M; Yildirim I
Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():250689. PubMed ID: 24371468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Geometric calibration of a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system based on distributed carbon nanotube X-ray source arrays.
Jiang C; Zhang N; Gao J; Hu Z
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188367. PubMed ID: 29186172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of a novel algorithm for metal artifact reduction in digital tomosynthesis using projection-based dual-energy material decomposition for arthroplasty: A phantom study.
Gomi T; Sakai R; Goto M; Hara H; Watanabe Y
Phys Med; 2018 Sep; 53():4-16. PubMed ID: 30241753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) acquisition parameters for human observers: effect of reconstruction algorithms.
Zeng R; Badano A; Myers KJ
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(7):2598-2611. PubMed ID: 28151728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An iterative reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis imaging using real data at three radiation doses.
Polat A; Yildirim I
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 29504549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system.
Zhou J; Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):1098-109. PubMed ID: 17441255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SU-E-J-05: Validation of an Iterative Tomosynthesis Algorithm for Low Dose on Board Cone Beam CT Patient Localization.
Izaguirre EW; Price SG; Yang D; Rangaraj D
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part6):3653. PubMed ID: 28517565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impulse response and Modulation Transfer Function analysis for Shift-And-Add and Back Projection image reconstruction algorithms in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT).
Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
Int J Funct Inform Personal Med; 2008; 1(2):189-204. PubMed ID: 23935707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of a Total Variation Minimization Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm to Evaluate Reduced Projections during Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Gomi T; Koibuchi Y
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():5239082. PubMed ID: 30018980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
