These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27053951)

  • 41. Web-based hearing screening test.
    Seren E
    Telemed J E Health; 2009 Sep; 15(7):678-81. PubMed ID: 19694590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Slight-mild sensorineural hearing loss in children: audiometric, clinical, and risk factor profiles.
    Cone BK; Wake M; Tobin S; Poulakis Z; Rickards FW
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):202-12. PubMed ID: 20054279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Diagnostic Hearing Assessment in Schools: Validity and Time Efficiency of Automated Audiometry.
    Mahomed-Asmail F; Swanepoel de W; Eikelboom RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 26809325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Three-year ear, nose, and throat cross-sectional analysis of audiometric protocols for magnetic resonance imaging screening of acoustic tumors.
    Cheng TC; Wareing MJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Mar; 146(3):438-47. PubMed ID: 22075076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments.
    Saliba J; Al-Reefi M; Carriere JS; Verma N; Provencal C; Rappaport JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 28025906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Development and Validation of a Portable Hearing Self-Testing System Based on a Notebook Personal Computer.
    Liu Y; Yang D; Xiong F; Yu L; Ji F; Wang QJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):716-723. PubMed ID: 26333879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of the Hearing Test Pro Application as a Screening Tool for Hearing Loss Assessment.
    Aremu SK
    Niger Med J; 2018; 59(5):55-58. PubMed ID: 31293289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Audiometric features in young adults with Turner syndrome.
    Bonnard Å; Hederstierna C; Bark R; Hultcrantz M
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Sep; 56(9):650-656. PubMed ID: 28420278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and hearing-impaired ears.
    Probst R; Hauser R
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1990; 11(4):236-43. PubMed ID: 2240411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Outcomes of transient evoked otoacoustic emission testing in 6-year-old school children: a comparison with pure tone screening and tympanometry.
    Driscoll C; Kei J; McPherson B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 Jan; 57(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 11165644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Improving Accuracy and Reliability of Hearing Tests: Measurement Standards for Audiometric Devices.
    Cho WH; Lee J; Seo YJ; Kong TH; Suh MJ; Jin IK; Oh SH; Lee HJ; Choi SJ; Park KH; Cha D
    J Audiol Otol; 2024 Jul; 28(3):167-175. PubMed ID: 39054854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Validity of diagnostic computer-based air and forehead bone conduction audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W; Biagio L
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Apr; 8(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 21391065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Determining the pure tone frequencies to be used in identification audiometry.
    Katt D; Sprague H
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1981 Nov; 46(4):433-6. PubMed ID: 7300270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The simplified HF E-800 high-frequency audiometer: clinical applications.
    Gauz MT; Smith MM; Hinkle RR
    J Aud Res; 1986 Apr; 26(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3624194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss after drill-generated acoustic trauma in tympanoplasty.
    Doménech J; Carulla M; Traserra J
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1989; 246(5):280-2. PubMed ID: 2590036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Paediatric hearing loss: a community-based survey in peri-urban Kumasi, Ghana.
    Larsen-Reindorf R; Otupiri E; Anomah JE; Edwards BM; Frimpong B; Waller B; Prince ME; Basura GJ
    J Laryngol Otol; 2019 Sep; 133(9):796-804. PubMed ID: 31434583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss: incorporating automatic conditional rescreening.
    Sheikh Rashid M; Dreschler WA
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2018 Oct; 91(7):877-885. PubMed ID: 29959525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Feasibility of a low-cost hearing screening in rural Indiana.
    Khan KM; Bielko SL; Barnes PA; Evans SS; Main ALK
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Sep; 17(1):715. PubMed ID: 28923033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Smartphone hearing screening with integrated quality control and data management.
    Swanepoel de W; Myburgh HC; Howe DM; Mahomed F; Eikelboom RH
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):841-9. PubMed ID: 24998412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.