BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2705410)

  • 1. A multivariate approach to analyzing the relation between occlusion and craniofacial morphology.
    Keeling SD; Riolo ML; Martin RE; Ten Have TR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Apr; 95(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 2705410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The occlusal plane in Class I and Class II malocclusion: its relation to craniofacial variables].
    Kuntz M; Turlot JC; Hildwein M
    Orthod Fr; 1988; 59 Pt 2():383-93. PubMed ID: 3078360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Craniofacial characteristics of subjects with normal and postnormal occlusions--a longitudinal study.
    Kerr WJ; Hirst D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Sep; 92(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 3477087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between cranial base and maxillofacial morphology.
    Kasai K; Moro T; Kanazawa E; Iwasawa T
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 8529753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multivariate analysis of the relations between craniofacial structure and occlusion with DiPaolo's quadrilateral measures.
    Meyers DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jul; 102(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 1626531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; D'Addona A; Miani A; Poggio CE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 8301166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Craniofacial characteristics in children with Angle Class II div. 2 malocclusion combined with extreme deep bite.
    Karlsen AT
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 8010520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lower cranial height vs craniofacial dimensions in Angle Class II malocclusion.
    Anderson DL; Popovich F
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Jul; 53(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 6579875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the closest speaking space in different dental and skeletal occlusions.
    Sakar O; Bural C; Sülün T; Öztaş E; Marşan G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 23566602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in maxillary and mandibular molar and incisor vertical dimension in 12-year-old subjects with excess, normal, and short lower anterior face height.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 7942657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical vertebral column morphology related to craniofacial morphology and head posture in preorthodontic children with Class II malocclusion and horizontal maxillary overjet.
    Arntsen T; Sonnesen L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jul; 140(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 21724066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Candidate Gene Analyses of Skeletal Variation in Malocclusion.
    da Fontoura CS; Miller SF; Wehby GL; Amendt BA; Holton NE; Southard TE; Allareddy V; Moreno Uribe LM
    J Dent Res; 2015 Jul; 94(7):913-20. PubMed ID: 25910506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Craniofacial morphology in women with Class I occlusion and severe maxillary anterior crowding.
    Ikoma M; Arai K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jan; 153(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 29287646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of functional versus bisected occlusal planes on the Wits appraisal.
    Thayer TA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 May; 97(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 2333856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlations among craniofacial angles and dimensions in Class I and Class II malocclusions.
    Anderson D; Popovich F
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2923320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Curve of Spee and its relationship to vertical eruption of teeth among different malocclusion groups.
    Veli I; Ozturk MA; Uysal T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 25726397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An analysis of craniofacial form; the need for new analytic techniques.
    Lavelle CL
    Anat Anz; 1985; 160(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 4083512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dentofacial features of children with distal occlusions, large overjets, and deepbites in the early mixed dentition.
    Keski-Nisula K; Keski-Nisula L; Mäkelä P; Mäki-Torkko T; Varrela J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 16979486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cephalometric comparison between Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion and normal occlusion in adults.
    Fischer-Brandies H; Fischer-Brandies E; König A
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 3860257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.