333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27054411)
1. Improved design and development of a functional moulded prosthetic foot.
Narayanan G; Gnanasundaram S; Ranganathan M; Ranganathan R; Gopalakrishna G; Das BN; Mandal AB
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(5):407-12. PubMed ID: 27054411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits of an increased prosthetic ankle range of motion for individuals with a trans-tibial amputation walking with a new prosthetic foot.
Heitzmann DWW; Salami F; De Asha AR; Block J; Putz C; Wolf SI; Alimusaj M
Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():174-180. PubMed ID: 29913354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefits of a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic foot for ascending and descending slopes.
Ernst M; Altenburg B; Schmalz T; Kannenberg A; Bellmann M
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jan; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 35090505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of foot and ankle prosthetic components on braking and propulsive impulses during transtibial amputee gait.
Zmitrewicz RJ; Neptune RR; Walden JG; Rogers WE; Bosker GW
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1334-9. PubMed ID: 17023242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees.
Agrawal V; Gailey RS; Gaunaurd IA; O'Toole C; Finnieston A; Tolchin R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Oct; 39(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 24925671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prescription of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms after lower limb amputation.
Hofstad C; Linde H; Limbeek J; Postema K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; 2004(1):CD003978. PubMed ID: 14974050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The efficacy of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot prototype 4.0 during walking: Physiological determinants.
De Pauw K; Cherelle P; Roelands B; Lefeber D; Meeusen R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):504-510. PubMed ID: 29623812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lower limb amputee gait characteristics on a specifically designed test ramp: Preliminary results of a biomechanical comparison of two prosthetic foot concepts.
Schmalz T; Altenburg B; Ernst M; Bellmann M; Rosenbaum D
Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():161-167. PubMed ID: 30497035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calculated functional joint center positions are highly variable in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation walking with identical prosthetic ankle-foot devices.
De Asha AR; Barnett CT
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Feb; 46(1):91-94. PubMed ID: 34840279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of push-off and collision work during step-to-step transition in amputees walking at self-selected speed: Effect of amputation level.
Sedran L; Bonnet X; Thomas-Pohl M; Loiret I; Martinet N; Pillet H; Paysant J
J Biomech; 2024 Jan; 163():111943. PubMed ID: 38244403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of prosthetic ankle units on roll-over shape characteristics during walking in persons with bilateral transtibial amputations.
Gard SA; Su PF; Lipschutz RD; Hansen AH
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2011; 48(9):1037-48. PubMed ID: 22234709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of a flat prosthetic foot rocker section on balance and mobility.
Hansen A; Nickel E; Medvec J; Brielmaier S; Pike A; Weber M
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(1):137-48. PubMed ID: 24805900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prosthetic feet: state-of-the-art review and the importance of mimicking human ankle-foot biomechanics.
Versluys R; Beyl P; Van Damme M; Desomer A; Van Ham R; Lefeber D
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2009 Mar; 4(2):65-75. PubMed ID: 19253096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional joint center of prosthetic feet during level ground and incline walking.
Lecomte C; Starker F; Guðnadóttir EÞ; Rafnsdóttir S; Guðmundsson K; Briem K; Brynjolfsson S
Med Eng Phys; 2020 Jul; 81():13-21. PubMed ID: 32527519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Energetic consequences of using a prosthesis with adaptive ankle motion during slope walking in persons with a transtibial amputation.
Darter BJ; Wilken JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Feb; 38(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 23525888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Continuous relative phases of walking with an articulated passive ankle-foot prosthesis in individuals with a unilateral transfemoral and transtibial amputation: an explorative case-control study.
Lathouwers E; Baeyens JP; Tassignon B; Gomez F; Cherelle P; Meeusen R; Vanderborght B; De Pauw K
Biomed Eng Online; 2023 Feb; 22(1):14. PubMed ID: 36793091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptions and biomechanical effects of varying prosthetic ankle stiffness during uphill walking: A case series.
Ármannsdóttir AL; Lecomte C; Lemaire E; Brynjólfsson S; Briem K
Gait Posture; 2024 Feb; 108():354-360. PubMed ID: 38227995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional performance differences between carbon fiber and fiberglass prosthetic feet.
Kaufman KR; Bernhardt K
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Jun; 45(3):205-213. PubMed ID: 33856155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subject-specific responses to an adaptive ankle prosthesis during incline walking.
Lamers EP; Eveld ME; Zelik KE
J Biomech; 2019 Oct; 95():109273. PubMed ID: 31431348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of a controlled energy storage and return prototype prosthetic foot on transtibial amputee ambulation.
Segal AD; Zelik KE; Klute GK; Morgenroth DC; Hahn ME; Orendurff MS; Adamczyk PG; Collins SH; Kuo AD; Czerniecki JM
Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Aug; 31(4):918-31. PubMed ID: 22100728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
