150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27054459)
1. WScore: A Flexible and Accurate Treatment of Explicit Water Molecules in Ligand-Receptor Docking.
Murphy RB; Repasky MP; Greenwood JR; Tubert-Brohman I; Jerome S; Annabhimoju R; Boyles NA; Schmitz CD; Abel R; Farid R; Friesner RA
J Med Chem; 2016 May; 59(9):4364-84. PubMed ID: 27054459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incorporating replacement free energy of binding-site waters in molecular docking.
Sun H; Zhao L; Peng S; Huang N
Proteins; 2014 Sep; 82(9):1765-76. PubMed ID: 24549784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Docking and free energy perturbation studies of ligand binding in the kappa opioid receptor.
Goldfeld DA; Murphy R; Kim B; Wang L; Beuming T; Abel R; Friesner RA
J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):824-35. PubMed ID: 25395044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Water Mapping and Scoring Approaches to Predict the Role of Hydration Sites in the Binding Affinity of PAK1 Inhibitors.
Biswal J; Jayaprakash P; Rayala SK; Venkatraman G; Rangasamy R; Poopandi S; Jeyakanthan J
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2022; 25(4):660-676. PubMed ID: 33687876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.
Friesner RA; Murphy RB; Repasky MP; Frye LL; Greenwood JR; Halgren TA; Sanschagrin PC; Mainz DT
J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(21):6177-96. PubMed ID: 17034125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AutoDock-GIST: Incorporating Thermodynamics of Active-Site Water into Scoring Function for Accurate Protein-Ligand Docking.
Uehara S; Tanaka S
Molecules; 2016 Nov; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 27886114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Molecular docking with ligand attached water molecules.
Lie MA; Thomsen R; Pedersen CN; Schiøtt B; Christensen MH
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Apr; 51(4):909-17. PubMed ID: 21452852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Docking performance of the glide program as evaluated on the Astex and DUD datasets: a complete set of glide SP results and selected results for a new scoring function integrating WaterMap and glide.
Repasky MP; Murphy RB; Banks JL; Greenwood JR; Tubert-Brohman I; Bhat S; Friesner RA
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Jun; 26(6):787-99. PubMed ID: 22576241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Target-specific native/decoy pose classifier improves the accuracy of ligand ranking in the CSAR 2013 benchmark.
Fourches D; Politi R; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jan; 55(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 25521713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of estrogen receptor β ligands potency and selectivity by docking and MM-GBSA scoring methods using three different scaffolds.
Balaji B; Ramanathan M
J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem; 2012 Dec; 27(6):832-44. PubMed ID: 21999568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Open challenges in structure-based virtual screening: Receptor modeling, target flexibility consideration and active site water molecules description.
Spyrakis F; Cavasotto CN
Arch Biochem Biophys; 2015 Oct; 583():105-19. PubMed ID: 26271444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting fragment binding poses using a combined MCSS MM-GBSA approach.
Haider MK; Bertrand HO; Hubbard RE
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 May; 51(5):1092-105. PubMed ID: 21528911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calculating Water Thermodynamics in the Binding Site of Proteins - Applications of WaterMap to Drug Discovery.
Cappel D; Sherman W; Beuming T
Curr Top Med Chem; 2017; 17(23):2586-2598. PubMed ID: 28413953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.
Friesner RA; Banks JL; Murphy RB; Halgren TA; Klicic JJ; Mainz DT; Repasky MP; Knoll EH; Shelley M; Perry JK; Shaw DE; Francis P; Shenkin PS
J Med Chem; 2004 Mar; 47(7):1739-49. PubMed ID: 15027865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvements, trends, and new ideas in molecular docking: 2012-2013 in review.
Yuriev E; Holien J; Ramsland PA
J Mol Recognit; 2015 Oct; 28(10):581-604. PubMed ID: 25808539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fast and accurate predictions of binding free energies using MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA.
Rastelli G; Del Rio A; Degliesposti G; Sgobba M
J Comput Chem; 2010 Mar; 31(4):797-810. PubMed ID: 19569205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
