These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27054791)

  • 1. The Impact of Obesity on Intraoperative Complications and Prolapse Recurrence After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Turner L; Lavelle E; Lowder JL; Shepherd JP
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 27054791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Case Order on Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: Do Surgeons Need a Warm-Up?
    Lavelle ES; Turner LC; Shepherd JP
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(4):272-275. PubMed ID: 28106657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse.
    Turner LC; Lavelle ES; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):797-803. PubMed ID: 26658893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy posthysterectomy: intraoperative feasibility and safety in obese women compared with women of normal weight.
    Mahoney C; Scott G; Dwyer L; Reid F; Ward K; Smith A; Kearney R
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2041-2048. PubMed ID: 30810783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Operative Time for Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: Comparison of Conventional Laparoscopy versus Robotic Platform.
    Glass Clark S; Melnyk AI; Bonidie M; Giugale L; Bradley MS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):1063-1067. PubMed ID: 35605827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of surgical start time in patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Jallad K; Barber MD; Ridgeway B; Paraiso MF; Unger CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1535-9. PubMed ID: 27026142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the Impact of Intraoperative Surgical Team Handoffs on Patient Outcomes.
    Giugale LE; Sears S; Lavelle ES; Carter-Brooks CM; Bonidie M; Shepherd JP
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(5):288-292. PubMed ID: 28106651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of age on complications in women undergoing minimally invasive sacral colpopexy.
    Turner LC; Kantartzis K; Lowder JL; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 24797942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women.
    Joubert M; Thubert T; Lefranc JP; Vaessen C; Chartier-Kastler É; Deffieux X; Rouprêt M
    Prog Urol; 2014 Dec; 24(17):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25450756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of obesity on operative complications and outcome after sacrocolpopexy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wen Q; Zhao Z; Wen J; Yang Y; Wang L; Wu J; Miao Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Mar; 258():309-316. PubMed ID: 33498005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences.
    Pulliam SJ; Weinstein MM; Wakamatsu MM
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 22453324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of BMI on clinical outcomes following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Patnam R; Husk K; Sripad A; Barletta K; Dieter A; Geller EJ
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 32300933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complications After Vaginal Vault Suspension Versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Elevated Body Mass Index: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Data From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Stairs J; Minassian V; Clancy A
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jun; 28(6):391-396. PubMed ID: 35234179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes in 450 Women After Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Mueller MG; Jacobs KM; Mueller ER; Abernethy MG; Kenton KS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 27054799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.