101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27055138)
1. SUV Normalized by Skeletal Volume on 18F-Fluoride PET/CT Studies.
Carvalho G; Marin JF; Garcez AT; Duarte PS; Sapienza MT; Buchpiguel CA
Clin Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 41(7):529-33. PubMed ID: 27055138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Variability of SUV Normalized by Skeletal Volume with the Variability of SUV Normalized by Body Weight in
Gomes Marin JF; Duarte PS; Willegaignon de Amorim de Carvalho J; Sado HN; Sapienza MT; Buchpiguel CA
J Nucl Med Technol; 2019 Mar; 47(1):60-63. PubMed ID: 30139886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of CT-based SUV normalization.
Devriese J; Beels L; Maes A; Van de Wiele C; Pottel H
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6369-83. PubMed ID: 27498994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Semiquantitative Analysis of the Biodistribution of the Combined ¹⁸F-NaF and ¹⁸F-FDG Administration for PET/CT Imaging.
Minamimoto R; Mosci C; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Habte F; Jackson T; Mittra E; Gambhir SS; Iagaru A
J Nucl Med; 2015 May; 56(5):688-94. PubMed ID: 25840978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT in oncology: an atlas of SUVs.
Sabbah N; Jackson T; Mosci C; Jamali M; Minamimoto R; Quon A; Mittra ES; Iagaru A
Clin Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 40(4):e228-31. PubMed ID: 25546225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standardized uptake value-based evaluations of solitary pulmonary nodules using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computed tomography.
Degirmenci B; Wilson D; Laymon CM; Becker C; Mason NS; Bencherif B; Agarwal A; Luketich J; Landreneau R; Avril N
Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Jul; 29(7):614-22. PubMed ID: 18528183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of Skeletal Tumor Burden on 18F-Fluoride PET/CT.
Rohren EM; Etchebehere EC; Araujo JC; Hobbs BP; Swanston NM; Everding M; Moody T; Macapinlac HA
J Nucl Med; 2015 Oct; 56(10):1507-12. PubMed ID: 26135112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences in sodium fluoride-18 uptake in the normal skeleton depending on the location and characteristics of the bone.
Nawata S; Kaneta T; Ogawa M; Ishiwata Y; Kobayashi N; Shishikura-Hino A; Yoshida K; Inaba Y; Saito T; Inoue T
Nuklearmedizin; 2017 Jun; 56(3):91-96. PubMed ID: 28488727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Within-patient variability of (18)F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues.
Paquet N; Albert A; Foidart J; Hustinx R
J Nucl Med; 2004 May; 45(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 15136627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment response evaluation with
Sachpekidis C; Hillengass J; Goldschmidt H; Wagner B; Haberkorn U; Kopka K; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 27573638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incremental Value of Cocktail 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET/CT Over 18F-FDG PET/CT Alone for Characterization of Skeletal Metastases in Breast Cancer.
Roop MJ; Singh B; Singh H; Watts A; Kohli PS; Mittal BR; Singh G
Clin Nucl Med; 2017 May; 42(5):335-340. PubMed ID: 28263210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing an 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG cocktail for PET assessment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Simoncic U; Perlman S; Liu G; Jeraj R
Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Dec; 36(12):1174-80. PubMed ID: 26378490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physiological uptake values of 18F-FDG in long bones of the lower extremity on PET/CT imaging.
van Vliet KE; van Eck-Smit BL; de Jong VM; Goslings JC; Schep NW; Termaat MF
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Jun; 37(6):589-92. PubMed ID: 26849073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Establishing Normal Testicular
Harper L; Simmons C; Nathan M; Thanarajasingam G; Kim H; Young J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jun; 216(6):1634-1640. PubMed ID: 33852335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Semiquantitative Assessment of
Minamimoto R; Xu G; Jamali M; Holley D; Barkhodari A; Zaharchuk G; Iagaru A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1136-1142. PubMed ID: 28777652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of PET standard uptake value and CT window-level thresholds for target delineation in CT-based radiation treatment planning.
Hong R; Halama J; Bova D; Sethi A; Emami B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(3):720-6. PubMed ID: 17293230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Retrospective Comparative Study of Sodium Fluoride Na
Kairemo K; Kangasmäki A; Kappadath SC; Joensuu T; Macapinlac HA
Life (Basel); 2022 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36556342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer.
Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A
J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of skeletal tumour burden on 18F-NaF PET/CT using a new quantitative method.
Lapa P; Marques M; Costa G; Iagaru A; Pedroso de Lima J
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Apr; 38(4):325-332. PubMed ID: 28230714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for classification of (18)F-NaF uptake on PET/CT.
Valadares AA; Duarte PS; Carvalho G; Ono CR; Coura-Filho GB; Sado HN; Sapienza MT; Buchpiguel CA
Radiol Bras; 2016; 49(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 26929455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
