These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27055459)

  • 1. Target templates specify visual, not semantic, features to guide search: A marked asymmetry between seeking and ignoring.
    Daffron JL; Davis G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2049-65. PubMed ID: 27055459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Templates for rejection can specify semantic properties of nontargets in natural scenes.
    Daffron JL; Davis G
    J Vis; 2015; 15(15):16. PubMed ID: 26605845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extra-foveal Processing of Object Semantics Guides Early Overt Attention During Visual Search.
    Cimminella F; Sala SD; Coco MI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):655-670. PubMed ID: 31792893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scene priming provides clues about target appearance that improve attentional guidance during categorical search.
    Robbins A; Hout MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Feb; 46(2):220-230. PubMed ID: 31697157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual search with varying versus consistent attentional templates: Effects on target template establishment, comparison, and guidance.
    Goldstein RR; Beck MR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1086-1102. PubMed ID: 29620379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrusive effects of semantic information on visual selective attention.
    Malcolm GL; Rattinger M; Shomstein S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2066-78. PubMed ID: 27381630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Searching for something familiar or novel: top-down attentional selection of specific items or object categories.
    Wu R; Scerif G; Aslin RN; Smith TJ; Nako R; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 May; 25(5):719-29. PubMed ID: 23281777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When meaning matters: The temporal dynamics of semantic influences on visual attention.
    de Groot F; Huettig F; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Feb; 42(2):180-96. PubMed ID: 26322686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The contents of the search template for category-level search in natural scenes.
    Reeder RR; Peelen MV
    J Vis; 2013 Jun; 13(3):13. PubMed ID: 23750015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Object-based target templates guide attention during visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1368-1382. PubMed ID: 29723006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scene semantics involuntarily guide attention during visual search.
    Hayes TR; Henderson JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1683-1689. PubMed ID: 31342407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced detection of gaze toward an object: Sociocognitive influences on visual search.
    Ramamoorthy N; Jamieson O; Imaan N; Plaisted-Grant K; Davis G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Apr; 28(2):494-502. PubMed ID: 33174087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search.
    Balani AB; Soto D; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1058-76. PubMed ID: 21156870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention: The type of memory-matching representation matters.
    Fan L; Sun M; Xu M; Li Z; Diao L; Zhang X
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():126-137. PubMed ID: 30471521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Activation of new attentional templates for real-world objects in visual search.
    Nako R; Smith TJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):902-12. PubMed ID: 25321485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contingent capture is weakened in search for multiple features from different dimensions.
    Biderman D; Biderman N; Zivony A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1974-1992. PubMed ID: 28425733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Size congruity influences visual search via the target template.
    Sobel KV; Puri AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():66-74. PubMed ID: 29351863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid guidance of visual search by object categories.
    Nako R; Wu R; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 23796065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.