368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27055919)
1. Non-Gaussian diffusion imaging for malignant and benign pulmonary nodule differentiation: a preliminary study.
Das SK; Yang DJ; Wang JL; Zhang C; Yang HF
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jan; 58(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 27055919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differentiating between malignant and benign solid solitary pulmonary lesions: are intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging superior to conventional diffusion-weighted imaging?
Wan Q; Deng YS; Lei Q; Bao YY; Wang YZ; Zhou JX; Zou Q; Li XC
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1607-1615. PubMed ID: 30255258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diffusion kurtosis imaging of the human kidney: a feasibility study.
Pentang G; Lanzman RS; Heusch P; Müller-Lutz A; Blondin D; Antoch G; Wittsack HJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 24582288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion kurtosis imaging for differentiating between the benign and malignant sinonasal lesions.
Jiang JX; Tang ZH; Zhong YF; Qiang JW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1446-1454. PubMed ID: 27758016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Volumetric analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion imaging for assessment of solitary pulmonary lesions.
Yuan M; Zhong Y; Zhang YD; Yu TF; Li H; Wu JF
Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1448-1456. PubMed ID: 28269992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
Mutlu H; Sivrioglu AK; Sonmez G; Velioglu M; Sildiroglu HO; Basekim CC; Kizilkaya E
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 22226435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.
Liu C; Liang C; Liu Z; Zhang S; Huang B
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e782-9. PubMed ID: 24034833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diffusion kurtosis imaging of the liver at 3 Tesla: in vivo comparison to standard diffusion-weighted imaging.
Budjan J; Sauter EA; Zoellner FG; Lemke A; Wambsganss J; Schoenberg SO; Attenberger UI
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jan; 59(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 28454487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiation between malignant and benign thyroid nodules and stratification of papillary thyroid cancer with aggressive histological features: Whole-lesion diffusion-weighted imaging histogram analysis.
Hao Y; Pan C; Chen W; Li T; Zhu W; Qi J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1546-1555. PubMed ID: 27093648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and ADC Mapping in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Thyroid Nodules.
Khizer AT; Raza S; Slehria AU
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Nov; 25(11):785-8. PubMed ID: 26577961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of diffusion kurtosis imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of breast tumors.
Li T; Yu T; Li L; Lu L; Zhuo Y; Lian J; Xiong Y; Kong D; Li K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1358-1366. PubMed ID: 29717790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of parallel diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map values for evaluating breast lesions: preliminary results.
Jin G; An N; Jacobs MA; Li K
Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 20207316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.
Cakir O; Arslan A; Inan N; Anık Y; Sarısoy T; Gumustas S; Akansel G
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e801-6. PubMed ID: 24099642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0 T in urinary bladder lesions: correlation with pathologic findings.
Suo ST; Chen XX; Fan Y; Wu LM; Yao QY; Cao MQ; Liu Q; Xu JR
Acad Radiol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):1027-34. PubMed ID: 24833566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Çabuk G; Nass Duce M; Özgür A; Apaydın FD; Polat A; Orekici G
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 59(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 25564776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of diffusional kurtosis tensor imaging in prostate MRI for the assessment of prostate cancer: preliminary results.
Quentin M; Pentang G; Schimmöller L; Kott O; Müller-Lutz A; Blondin D; Arsov C; Hiester A; Rabenalt R; Wittsack HJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):880-5. PubMed ID: 24848289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusion kurtosis imaging does not improve differentiation performance of breast lesions in a short clinical protocol.
Palm T; Wenkel E; Ohlmeyer S; Janka R; Uder M; Weiland E; Bickelhaupt S; Ladd ME; Zaitsev M; Hensel B; Laun FB
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 63():205-216. PubMed ID: 31425816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion models for differential diagnosis of prostate cancer with in-bore transrectal MR-guided biopsy as a pathological reference.
Li C; Chen M; Wan B; Yu J; Liu M; Zhang W; Wang J
Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1395-1402. PubMed ID: 29486596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion Kurtosis at 3.0T as an in vivo Imaging Marker for Breast Cancer Characterization: Correlation With Prognostic Factors.
Huang Y; Lin Y; Hu W; Ma C; Lin W; Wang Z; Liang J; Ye W; Zhao J; Wu R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):845-856. PubMed ID: 30260589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
