152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27056072)
1. Identifying and processing the gap between perceived and actual agreement in breast pathology interpretation.
Carney PA; Allison KH; Oster NV; Frederick PD; Morgan TR; Geller BM; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Mod Pathol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):717-26. PubMed ID: 27056072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study.
Elmore JG; Tosteson AN; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Geller B; Carney PA; Onega T; Allison KH; Jackson SL; Weaver DL
BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3069. PubMed ID: 27334105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens.
Elmore JG; Longton GM; Carney PA; Geller BM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Nelson HD; Pepe MS; Allison KH; Schnitt SJ; O'Malley FP; Weaver DL
JAMA; 2015 Mar; 313(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 25781441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The diagnostic challenge of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ.
Onega T; Weaver DL; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Tosteson ANA; Carney PA; Geller BM; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Oster NV; Pepe MS; Elmore JG
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 80():39-47. PubMed ID: 28535496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic Reproducibility: What Happens When the Same Pathologist Interprets the Same Breast Biopsy Specimen at Two Points in Time?
Jackson SL; Frederick PD; Pepe MS; Nelson HD; Weaver DL; Allison KH; Carney PA; Geller BM; Tosteson AN; Onega T; Elmore JG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 24(5):1234-1241. PubMed ID: 27913946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of Machine Learning of Breast Pathology Structures for Automated Differentiation of Breast Cancer and High-Risk Proliferative Lesions.
Mercan E; Mehta S; Bartlett J; Shapiro LG; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Aug; 2(8):e198777. PubMed ID: 31397859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complexities of perceived and actual performance in pathology interpretation: A comparison of cutaneous melanocytic skin and breast interpretations.
Carney PA; Frederick PD; Reisch LM; Titus L; Knezevich SR; Weinstock MA; Piepkorn MW; Barnhill RL; Elder DE; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
J Cutan Pathol; 2018 Jul; 45(7):478-490. PubMed ID: 29603324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Region of interest identification and diagnostic agreement in breast pathology.
Nagarkar DB; Mercan E; Weaver DL; Brunyé TT; Carney PA; Rendi MH; Beck AH; Frederick PD; Shapiro LG; Elmore JG
Mod Pathol; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1004-11. PubMed ID: 27198567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical implications and variability in the use of the flat epithelial atypia diagnosis on breast biopsy specimens.
Samples LS; Rendi MH; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Nelson HD; Morgan TR; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Breast; 2017 Aug; 34():34-43. PubMed ID: 28475933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Interobserver reproducibility in the pathologic diagnosis of borderline ductal proliferative breast diseases].
Wei B; Bu H; Zhu CR; Guo LX; Chen HJ; Zhao C; Zhang P; Chen DY; Tang Y; Jiang Y
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Nov; 35(6):849-53. PubMed ID: 15573772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Second opinion in breast pathology: policy, practice and perception.
Geller BM; Nelson HD; Carney PA; Weaver DL; Onega T; Allison KH; Frederick PD; Tosteson AN; Elmore JG
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):955-60. PubMed ID: 25053542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variability in Pathologists' Interpretations of Individual Breast Biopsy Slides: A Population Perspective.
Elmore JG; Nelson HD; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Tosteson AN; Geller B; Onega T; Carney PA; Jackson SL; Allison KH; Weaver DL
Ann Intern Med; 2016 May; 164(10):649-55. PubMed ID: 26999810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Atypia in breast pathology: what pathologists need to know.
Katayama A; Toss MS; Parkin M; Ellis IO; Quinn C; Rakha EA
Pathology; 2022 Feb; 54(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 34872753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Papillary lesions of the breast: impact of breast pathology subspecialization on core biopsy and excision diagnoses.
Jakate K; De Brot M; Goldberg F; Muradali D; O'Malley FP; Mulligan AM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Apr; 36(4):544-51. PubMed ID: 22314186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histological features associated with diagnostic agreement in atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast: illustrative cases from the B-Path study.
Allison KH; Rendi MH; Peacock S; Morgan T; Elmore JG; Weaver DL
Histopathology; 2016 Dec; 69(6):1028-1046. PubMed ID: 27398812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
Alghamdi SA; Krishnamurthy K; Garces Narvaez SA; Algashaamy KJ; Aoun J; Reis IM; Recine MA; Jorda M; Poppiti RJ; Gomez-Fernandez CR
Am J Clin Pathol; 2020 Feb; 153(3):360-367. PubMed ID: 31769792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy is in the eyes of the pathologist: The visual interpretive process and diagnostic accuracy with digital whole slide images.
Brunyé TT; Mercan E; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
J Biomed Inform; 2017 Feb; 66():171-179. PubMed ID: 28087402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pathological diagnosis of columnar cell lesions of the breast: are there issues of reproducibility?
Tan PH; Ho BC; Selvarajan S; Yap WM; Hanby A
J Clin Pathol; 2005 Jul; 58(7):705-9. PubMed ID: 15976336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnosis of Papillary Breast Lesions on Core Needle Biopsy: Upgrade Rates and Interobserver Variability.
Qiu L; Mais DD; Nicolas M; Nanyes J; Kist K; Nazarullah A
Int J Surg Pathol; 2019 Oct; 27(7):736-743. PubMed ID: 31187678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Atypia on breast core needle biopsies: reproducibility and significance.
Darvishian F; Singh B; Simsir A; Ye W; Cangiarella JF
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2009; 39(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 19667411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
