These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27056121)

  • 1. An angiographic tool based on Visual estimation for Risk prEdiction of Side branch OccLusion in coronary bifurcation interVEntion: the V-RESOLVE score system.
    Dou K; Zhang D; Xu B; Yang Y; Yin D; Qiao S; Wu Y; You S; Wang Y; Yan R; Gao R; Kirtane AJ
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Apr; 11(14):e1604-11. PubMed ID: 27056121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An angiographic tool for risk prediction of side branch occlusion in coronary bifurcation intervention: the RESOLVE score system (Risk prEdiction of Side branch OccLusion in coronary bifurcation interVEntion).
    Dou K; Zhang D; Xu B; Yang Y; Yin D; Qiao S; Wu Y; Yan H; You S; Wang Y; Wu Z; Gao R; Kirtane AJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt A):39-46. PubMed ID: 25616815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the V-RESOLVE (Visual Estimation for Risk prEdiction of Side Branch OccLusion in Coronary Bifurcation interVEntion) score system.
    He Y; Zhang D; Yin D; Zhu C; Feng L; Song C; Chen C; Xu B; Dou K
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(S1):591-598. PubMed ID: 29359406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and validation of a risk scoring system based on baseline angiographic results by visual estimation for risk prEdiction of side-branch OccLusion in coronary bifurcation InterVEntion: The baseline V-RESOLVE score.
    He Y; Zhang D; Yin D; Zhu C; Feng L; Song C; Chen C; Feng L; Dou K
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 93(S1):810-817. PubMed ID: 30690861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of RESOLVE score derived from coronary computed tomography versus visual angiography to predict side branch occlusion in percutaneous bifurcation intervention.
    Opolski MP; Grodecki K; Staruch AD; Michalowska AM; Kepka C; Wolny R; Knaapen P; Schumacher SP; Pregowski J; Kruk M; Debski M; Debski A; Michalowska I; Witkowski A
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(3):258-265. PubMed ID: 31806391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the V-RESOLVE (Visual Estimation for Risk prEdiction of Side Branch OccLusion in Coronary Bifurcation interVEntion) score system in unprotected left main bifurcation.
    He J; Zhang D; Zhang R; Wang H; Wu S; Feng L; Yin D; Xu B; Dou K
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 May; 99 Suppl 1():1465-1472. PubMed ID: 35094485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomised comparison of Conventional versus Intentional straTegy in patients with high Risk prEdiction of Side branch OccLusion in coronary bifurcation interVEntion: rationale and design of the CIT-RESOLVE trial.
    Zhang D; Yin D; Song C; Zhu C; Kirtane AJ; Xu B; Dou K
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(6):e016044. PubMed ID: 28606906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visually Estimated RESOLVE Score Based on Coronary Computed Tomography to Predict Side Branch Occlusion in Percutaneous Bifurcation Intervention.
    Michalowska AM; Grodecki K; Staruch AD; Kepka C; Wolny R; Pregowski J; Kruk M; Debski M; Debski A; Michalowska I; Witkowski A; Opolski MP
    J Thorac Imaging; 2021 May; 36(3):189-196. PubMed ID: 33464008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrepancy in the assessment of jailed side branch lesions by visual estimation and quantitative coronary angiographic analysis: comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Shin DH; Koo BK; Waseda K; Park KW; Kim HS; Corral M; Lansky A; Honda Y; Fearon WF; Fitzgerald PJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Nov; 78(5):720-6. PubMed ID: 22025472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual estimation versus different quantitative coronary angiography methods to assess lesion severity in bifurcation lesions.
    Grundeken MJ; Collet C; Ishibashi Y; Généreux P; Muramatsu T; LaSalle L; Kaplan AV; Wykrzykowska JJ; Morel MA; Tijssen JG; de Winter RJ; Onuma Y; Leon MB; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1263-1270. PubMed ID: 28836339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of quantitative and qualitative coronary angiography: computer versus the eye.
    Sen T; Kilit C; Astarcioglu MA; Asarcikli LD; Aksu T; Kafes H; Parspur A; Gozubuyuk G; Amasyali B
    Cardiovasc J Afr; 2018; 29(5):278-282. PubMed ID: 30395141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-core lab variability in analyzing quantitative coronary angiography for bifurcation lesions: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized trial.
    Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Généreux P; LaSalle L; Iqbal J; Wykrzykowska JJ; Morel MA; Tijssen JG; de Winter RJ; Girasis C; Garcia-Garcia HM; Onuma Y; Leon MB; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Feb; 8(2):305-314. PubMed ID: 25700754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials.
    Zhang YJ; Zhu H; Shi SY; Muramatsu T; Pan DR; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Tian NL; Bourantas CV; Chen SL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87 Suppl 1():589-98. PubMed ID: 26876688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of side branch occlusions in percutaneous coronary interventions by coronary computed tomography: the CT bifurcation score as a novel tool for predicting intraprocedural side branch occlusion.
    Lee SH; Lee JM; Song YB; Park TK; Yang JH; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Gwon HC; Lee SH; Kim SM; Choe YH; Choi JH
    EuroIntervention; 2019 Oct; 15(9):e788-e795. PubMed ID: 30636682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity and variability in visual assessment of stenosis severity in phantom bifurcation lesions: a survey in experts during the fifth meeting of the European Bifurcation Club.
    Girasis C; Onuma Y; Schuurbiers JC; Morel MA; van Es GA; van Geuns RJ; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Feb; 79(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 22072537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography bifurcation analyses for the assessment of bifurcation lesions: A subanalysis of the TRYTON pivotal IDE coronary bifurcation trial.
    Muramatsu T; Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Nakatani S; Girasis C; Campos CM; Morel MA; Jonker H; de Winter RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; García-García HM; Leon MB; Serruys PW; Onuma Y;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Sep; 86(3):E140-9. PubMed ID: 25914327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bifurcation lesions: Functional assessment by fractional flow reserve vs. anatomical assessment using conventional and dedicated bifurcation quantitative coronary angiogram.
    Sarno G; Garg S; Onuma Y; Girasis C; Tonino P; Morel MA; van Es GA; Pijls N; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Nov; 76(6):817-23. PubMed ID: 20578164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Tu S; Holm NR; Koning G; Maeng M; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug; 78(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 21766427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic accuracy in coronary stenosis: comparison between visual score and quantitative analysis (quantitative computed tomographic angiography) in coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography-coronary angiography and quantitative analysis (quantitative coronary angiography) in conventional coronary angiography.
    Malagò R; D'Onofrio M; Tavella D; Mantovani W; Brunelli S; Pezzato A; Caliari G; Nicolì L; Benussi P; Mucelli RP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(5):652-9. PubMed ID: 20861765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A New Scoring System Predicting Side-Branch Occlusion in Patients Undergoing Left Main Bifurcation Intervention: The LM V-RESOLVE Score.
    He J; Cai Z; Wang HY; Zhang R; Zheng Z; Yang M; Xu B; Dou K
    Can J Cardiol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38360149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.