128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27056145)
1. INFLUENCE OF LOCALIZER AND SCAN DIRECTION ON THE DOSE-REDUCING EFFECT OF AUTOMATIC TUBE CURRENT MODULATION IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
Franck C; Bacher K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):136-42. PubMed ID: 27056145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. OVERVIEW, PRACTICAL TIPS AND POTENTIAL PITFALLS OF USING AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE CONTROL IN CT: SIEMENS CARE DOSE 4D.
Söderberg M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):84-91. PubMed ID: 26567324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Localizer Radiography Projection on Organ Dose at Chest CT with Automatic Tube Current Modulation.
Saltybaeva N; Krauss A; Alkadhi H
Radiology; 2017 Mar; 282(3):842-849. PubMed ID: 27548276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. IMPLICATIONS OF PATIENT CENTRING ON ORGAN DOSE IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
Kataria B; Sandborg M; Althén JN
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):130-5. PubMed ID: 26743256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of different phantom designs for CT scanner automatic tube current modulation system tests.
Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):735-61. PubMed ID: 24025482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multidetector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality.
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4567-76. PubMed ID: 18975703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improvements to image quality using hybrid and model-based iterative reconstructions: a phantom study.
Aurumskjöld ML; Ydström K; Tingberg A; Söderberg M
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jan; 58(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 26924832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chest CT performed with 3D and z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique: breast and effective doses.
Matsubara K; Takata T; Koshida K; Noto K; Shimono T; Horii J; Yamamoto T; Matsui O
Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 19268857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated computed tomography dose-saving algorithm to protect radiosensitive tissues: estimation of radiation exposure and image quality considerations.
Ketelsen D; Buchgeister M; Fenchel M; Schmidt B; Flohr TG; Syha R; Thomas C; Tsiflikas I; Claussen CD; Heuschmid M
Invest Radiol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 21934513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thyroid shields versus z-axis automatic tube current modulation for dose reduction at neck CT.
Leswick DA; Hunt MM; Webster ST; Fladeland DA
Radiology; 2008 Nov; 249(2):572-80. PubMed ID: 18780826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How Low Can We Go in Radiation Dose for the Data-Completion Scan on a Research Whole-Body Photon-Counting Computed Tomography System.
Yu Z; Leng S; Li Z; Halaweish AF; Kappler S; Ritman EL; McCollough CH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(4):663-70. PubMed ID: 27096399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated low-kilovoltage selection in pediatric computed tomography angiography: phantom study evaluating effects on radiation dose and image quality.
Siegel MJ; Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Hildebolt C; Bradley D; Schmidt B
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):584-9. PubMed ID: 23563195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of a dose monitoring software tool based on Monte Carlo Simulation in assessment of eye lens doses for cranial CT scans.
Guberina N; Suntharalingam S; Naßenstein K; Forsting M; Theysohn J; Wetter A; Ringelstein A
Neuroradiology; 2016 Oct; 58(10):955-959. PubMed ID: 27438801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volume-of-interest (VOI) imaging in C-arm flat-detector CT for high image quality at reduced dose.
Kolditz D; Kyriakou Y; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2719-30. PubMed ID: 20632582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of automatic tube current modulation with a standardized noise index in young children undergoing chest computed tomography scans with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.
Peng Y; Li J; Ma D; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Zeng J; Sun G
Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1175-81. PubMed ID: 19922316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the impact of scan settings on automatic tube current modulation in CT using a novel phantom.
Merzan D; Nowik P; Poludniowski G; Bujila R
Br J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 90(1069):20160308. PubMed ID: 27845559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of breast absorbed doses during thoracic computed tomography scan to evaluate the effectiveness of bismuth shielding.
Alonso TC; Mourão AP; Santana PC; da Silva TA
Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Nov; 117():55-57. PubMed ID: 27033028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lens dose in routine head CT: comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms.
Nikupaavo U; Kaasalainen T; Reijonen V; Ahonen SM; Kortesniemi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 25539246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems.
Tsalafoutas IA; Varsamidis A; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111918. PubMed ID: 24320451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
