These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27056975)

  • 21. Mental rotation impairs attention shifting and short-term memory encoding: neurophysiological evidence against the response-selection bottleneck model of dual-task performance.
    Pannebakker MM; Jolicœur P; van Dam WO; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR; Hommel B
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Sep; 49(11):2985-93. PubMed ID: 21736889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adding details to the attentional template offsets search difficulty: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.
    Schmidt J; Zelinsky GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):429-437. PubMed ID: 28240928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Huang S; Kong L; Wang S
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2356-61. PubMed ID: 21964327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attentional templates in visual working memory.
    Carlisle NB; Arita JT; Pardo D; Woodman GF
    J Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 31(25):9315-22. PubMed ID: 21697381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Behind the scenes: how visual memory load biases selective attention during processing of visual streams.
    Klaver P; Talsma D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1133-46. PubMed ID: 24015992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
    SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention?
    Woodman GF; Carlisle NB; Reinhart RM
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23444390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term visual associations affect attentional guidance.
    Olivers CN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jun; 137(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 20673859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Event-related potentials dissociate perceptual from response-related age effects in visual search.
    Wiegand I; Finke K; Müller HJ; Töllner T
    Neurobiol Aging; 2013 Mar; 34(3):973-85. PubMed ID: 22921866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex.
    Scalf PE; Dux PE; Marois R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2593-604. PubMed ID: 21281093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sequential neural processes of tactile-visual crossmodal working memory.
    Ohara S; Lenz F; Zhou YD
    Neuroscience; 2006 Apr; 139(1):299-309. PubMed ID: 16324794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The short- and long-term fates of memory items retained outside the focus of attention.
    LaRocque JJ; Eichenbaum AS; Starrett MJ; Rose NS; Emrich SM; Postle BR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):453-68. PubMed ID: 25472902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Components of working memory and visual selective attention.
    Burnham BR; Sabia M; Langan C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):391-403. PubMed ID: 23875574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing the effect of pain on demands for attentional resources using ERPs.
    Houlihan ME; McGrath PJ; Connolly JF; Stroink G; Allen Finley G; Dick B; Phi TT
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Jan; 51(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 14693366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Working memory distortions of duration perception are modulated by attentional tags.
    Pan Y; Hou X
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Mar; 165():48-52. PubMed ID: 26922616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Time-resolved neuroimaging of visual short term memory consolidation by post-perceptual attention shifts.
    Hecht M; Thiemann U; Freitag CM; Bender S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():964-977. PubMed ID: 26571051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biased towards food: Electrophysiological evidence for biased attention to food stimuli.
    Kumar S; Higgs S; Rutters F; Humphreys GW
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Dec; 110():85-93. PubMed ID: 27156801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Orienting to external versus internal regions of space: consequences of attending in advance versus after the fact.
    Broadway JM; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Mar; 49(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 22091588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.