These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27057545)

  • 41. MetaPheno: A critical evaluation of deep learning and machine learning in metagenome-based disease prediction.
    LaPierre N; Ju CJ; Zhou G; Wang W
    Methods; 2019 Aug; 166():74-82. PubMed ID: 30885720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Interpretable metric learning in comparative metagenomics: The adaptive Haar-like distance.
    Gorman ED; Lladser ME
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2024 May; 20(5):e1011543. PubMed ID: 38768195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Automated Surgical Term Clustering: A Text Mining Approach for Unstructured Textual Surgery Descriptions.
    Khaleghi T; Murat A; Arslanturk S; Davies E
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 Jul; 24(7):2107-2118. PubMed ID: 31796420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Solving text clustering problem using a memetic differential evolution algorithm.
    Mustafa HMJ; Ayob M; Albashish D; Abu-Taleb S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0232816. PubMed ID: 32525869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Active learning for clinical text classification: is it better than random sampling?
    Figueroa RL; Zeng-Treitler Q; Ngo LH; Goryachev S; Wiechmann EP
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2012; 19(5):809-16. PubMed ID: 22707743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Meta-network: optimized species-species network analysis for microbial communities.
    Yang P; Yu S; Cheng L; Ning K
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Apr; 20(Suppl 2):187. PubMed ID: 30967118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions.
    Douglas GM; Maffei VJ; Zaneveld JR; Yurgel SN; Brown JR; Taylor CM; Huttenhower C; Langille MGI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2020 Jun; 38(6):685-688. PubMed ID: 32483366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. DEPP: Deep Learning Enables Extending Species Trees using Single Genes.
    Jiang Y; Balaban M; Zhu Q; Mirarab S
    Syst Biol; 2023 May; 72(1):17-34. PubMed ID: 35485976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Predicting microbial interactions through computational approaches.
    Li C; Lim KM; Chng KR; Nagarajan N
    Methods; 2016 Jun; 102():12-9. PubMed ID: 27025964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sentimental text mining based on an additional features method for text classification.
    Cheng CH; Chen HH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0217591. PubMed ID: 31166975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Visualization and statistical comparisons of microbial communities using R packages on Phylochip data.
    Holmes S; Alekseyenko A; Timme A; Nelson T; Pasricha PJ; Spormann A
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2011; ():142-53. PubMed ID: 21121042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. GNPI: Graph normalization to integrate phylogenetic information for metagenomic host phenotype prediction.
    Li B; Zhong D; Qiao J; Jiang X
    Methods; 2022 Sep; 205():11-17. PubMed ID: 35636652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Domain intelligible models.
    Imangaliyev S; Prodan A; Nieuwdorp M; Groen AK; van Riel NAW; Levin E
    Methods; 2018 Oct; 149():69-73. PubMed ID: 29981382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Data Mining and Endocrine Diseases: A New Way to Classify?
    Salazar J; Espinoza C; Mindiola A; Bermudez V
    Arch Med Res; 2018 Apr; 49(3):213-215. PubMed ID: 30119981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Edge principal components and squash clustering: using the special structure of phylogenetic placement data for sample comparison.
    Matsen FA; Evans SN
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e56859. PubMed ID: 23505415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Two datasets of defect reports labeled by a crowd of annotators of unknown reliability.
    Hernández-González J; Rodriguez D; Inza I; Harrison R; Lozano JA
    Data Brief; 2018 Jun; 18():840-845. PubMed ID: 29900248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Identifying Heart Failure Patients by Medical Text Classification.
    Krebs J; Krug M; Fette G; Dietrich G; Ertl M; Güder G; Puppe F; Kaspar M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019; 258():251-252. PubMed ID: 30942762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Assessment of Common and Emerging Bioinformatics Pipelines for Targeted Metagenomics.
    Siegwald L; Touzet H; Lemoine Y; Hot D; Audebert C; Caboche S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169563. PubMed ID: 28052134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. IMP: a pipeline for reproducible reference-independent integrated metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses.
    Narayanasamy S; Jarosz Y; Muller EE; Heintz-Buschart A; Herold M; Kaysen A; Laczny CC; Pinel N; May P; Wilmes P
    Genome Biol; 2016 Dec; 17(1):260. PubMed ID: 27986083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Bioinformatics strategies for taxonomy independent binning and visualization of sequences in shotgun metagenomics.
    Sedlar K; Kupkova K; Provaznik I
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2017; 15():48-55. PubMed ID: 27980708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.