These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27057643)

  • 1. Biomolecular Force Field Parameterization via Atoms-in-Molecule Electron Density Partitioning.
    Cole DJ; Vilseck JZ; Tirado-Rives J; Payne MC; Jorgensen WL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 May; 12(5):2312-23. PubMed ID: 27057643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new force field (ECEPP-05) for peptides, proteins, and organic molecules.
    Arnautova YA; Jagielska A; Scheraga HA
    J Phys Chem B; 2006 Mar; 110(10):5025-44. PubMed ID: 16526746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Machine Learning of Partial Charges Derived from High-Quality Quantum-Mechanical Calculations.
    Bleiziffer P; Schaller K; Riniker S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Mar; 58(3):579-590. PubMed ID: 29461814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimized Lennard-Jones Parameters for Druglike Small Molecules.
    Boulanger E; Huang L; Rupakheti C; MacKerell AD; Roux B
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Jun; 14(6):3121-3131. PubMed ID: 29694035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Explicit polarization: a quantum mechanical framework for developing next generation force fields.
    Gao J; Truhlar DG; Wang Y; Mazack MJ; Löffler P; Provorse MR; Rehak P
    Acc Chem Res; 2014 Sep; 47(9):2837-45. PubMed ID: 25098651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Theoretical modeling of large molecular systems. Advances in the local self consistent field method for mixed quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics calculations.
    Monari A; Rivail JL; Assfeld X
    Acc Chem Res; 2013 Feb; 46(2):596-603. PubMed ID: 23249409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. QUBEKit: Automating the Derivation of Force Field Parameters from Quantum Mechanics.
    Horton JT; Allen AEA; Dodda LS; Cole DJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Apr; 59(4):1366-1381. PubMed ID: 30742438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of charge models for fixed-charge force fields: small-molecule hydration free energies in explicit solvent.
    Mobley DL; Dumont E; Chodera JD; Dill KA
    J Phys Chem B; 2007 Mar; 111(9):2242-54. PubMed ID: 17291029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parametrization of halogen bonds in the CHARMM general force field: Improved treatment of ligand-protein interactions.
    Soteras Gutiérrez I; Lin FY; Vanommeslaeghe K; Lemkul JA; Armacost KA; Brooks CL; MacKerell AD
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2016 Oct; 24(20):4812-4825. PubMed ID: 27353885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some practical approaches to treating electrostatic polarization of proteins.
    Ji C; Mei Y
    Acc Chem Res; 2014 Sep; 47(9):2795-803. PubMed ID: 24883956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polarized Protein-Specific Charges from Atoms-in-Molecule Electron Density Partitioning.
    Lee LP; Cole DJ; Skylaris CK; Jorgensen WL; Payne MC
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Jul; 9(7):2981-2991. PubMed ID: 23894231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Toolkit to Fit Nonbonded Parameters from and for Condensed Phase Simulations.
    Hédin F; El Hage K; Meuwly M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Aug; 56(8):1479-89. PubMed ID: 27438992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Free energies of binding from large-scale first-principles quantum mechanical calculations: application to ligand hydration energies.
    Fox SJ; Pittock C; Tautermann CS; Fox T; Christ C; Malcolm NO; Essex JW; Skylaris CK
    J Phys Chem B; 2013 Aug; 117(32):9478-85. PubMed ID: 23841453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward a new approach for determination of solute's charge distribution to analyze interatomic electrostatic interactions in quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical simulations.
    Yamada K; Koyano Y; Okamoto T; Asada T; Koga N; Nagaoka M
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Nov; 32(14):3092-104. PubMed ID: 21815177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrostatic embedding in large-scale first principles quantum mechanical calculations on biomolecules.
    Fox SJ; Pittock C; Fox T; Tautermann CS; Malcolm N; Skylaris CK
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Dec; 135(22):224107. PubMed ID: 22168680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Communication: Quantum polarized fluctuating charge model: a practical method to include ligand polarizability in biomolecular simulations.
    Kimura SR; Rajamani R; Langley DR
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Dec; 135(23):231101. PubMed ID: 22191857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ligand-Binding Affinity Estimates Supported by Quantum-Mechanical Methods.
    Ryde U; Söderhjelm P
    Chem Rev; 2016 May; 116(9):5520-66. PubMed ID: 27077817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A quantum mechanical computational method for modeling electrostatic and solvation effects of protein.
    Wang X; Li Y; Gao Y; Yang Z; Lu C; Zhu T
    Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):5475. PubMed ID: 29615707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reaction path potential for complex systems derived from combined ab initio quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical calculations.
    Lu Z; Yang W
    J Chem Phys; 2004 Jul; 121(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 15260525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Data-Driven Mapping of Gas-Phase Quantum Calculations to General Force Field Lennard-Jones Parameters.
    Kantonen SM; Muddana HS; Schauperl M; Henriksen NM; Wang LP; Gilson MK
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Feb; 16(2):1115-1127. PubMed ID: 31917572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.