BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27058251)

  • 1. The Healthcare Improvement Scotland evidence note rapid review process: providing timely, reliable evidence to inform imperative decisions on healthcare.
    McIntosh HM; Calvert J; Macpherson KJ; Thompson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2016 Jun; 14(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 27058251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Quality of health care, accreditation, and health technology assessment in Croatia: role of agency for quality and accreditation in health].
    Mittermayer R; Huić M; Mestrović J
    Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Dec; 64(5):425-34. PubMed ID: 21692267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments.
    Harker J; Kleijnen J
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2012 Dec; 10(4):397-410. PubMed ID: 23173665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EXPERIENCES IN ADAPTING EUROPEAN NETWORK FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT RAPID REVIEWS TO INFORM LOCAL DECISION MAKING.
    Macpherson K; Thompson L
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 28595667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Rapid Reviews: Sisyphos' Salvation? - An Inventory].
    Mattivi JT; Buchberger B
    Gesundheitswesen; 2017 May; 79(5):438-442. PubMed ID: 25985227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?
    Tsertsvadze A; Chen YF; Moher D; Sutcliffe P; McCarthy N
    Syst Rev; 2015 Nov; 4():160. PubMed ID: 26563648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Five years of peer reviewing in the Quality Medicine Initiative].
    Eberlein-Gonska M; Budic A; Winklmair C; Petzold T
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(9-10):650-9. PubMed ID: 26699252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group to play a leading role in guiding the production of informed high-quality, timely research evidence syntheses.
    Garritty C; Stevens A; Gartlehner G; King V; Kamel C;
    Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 5(1):184. PubMed ID: 27793186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
    Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NICE guidance in the Scottish context.
    Kohli H; Tannahill A
    Scott Med J; 2009 Feb; 54(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 19291935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid review: an emerging approach to evidence synthesis in health technology assessment.
    Khangura S; Polisena J; Clifford TJ; Farrah K; Kamel C
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Jan; 30(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 24451157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Development and Use of Evidence Summaries for Point of Care Information Systems: A Streamlined Rapid Review Approach.
    Munn Z; Lockwood C; Moola S
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2015 Jun; 12(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 25996621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: an inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment.
    Watt A; Cameron A; Sturm L; Lathlean T; Babidge W; Blamey S; Facey K; Hailey D; Norderhaug I; Maddern G
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 18400114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the impact of accreditation and external peer review.
    Kilsdonk M; Siesling S; Otter R; Harten Wv
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2015; 28(8):757-77. PubMed ID: 26440481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.