These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27058327)
1. [A new method for the disruption of cell walls of gram-positive bacteria and mycobacteria on the point of nucleic acid extraction: sand method]. Şahin F; Kıyan M; Karasartova D; Çalgın MK; Akhter S; Türegün Atasoy B Mikrobiyol Bul; 2016 Jan; 50(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 27058327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polymerase chain reaction of bacterial genomes with single universal primer: application to distinguishing mycobacteria species. Bahrmand AR; Madani H; Bakayev VV; Babaei MH; Samar G; Anashchenko V Mol Cell Probes; 1996 Apr; 10(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 8737395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Obtaining and characterization of DNA-containing micromummies of yeasts and gram-positive bacteria with enhanced cell wall permeability: application in PCR]. Danilevich VN; Duda VI; Suzina NE; Grishin EV Mikrobiologiia; 2007; 76(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 17410877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simple and efficient Triton X-100 boiling and chloroform extraction method of RNA isolation from Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Sung K; Khan SA; Nawaz MS; Khan AA FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2003 Dec; 229(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 14659548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of three DNA extractive procedures with Leptospira for polymerase chain reaction analysis. Veloso IF; Lopes MT; Salas CE; Moreira EC Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz; 2000; 95(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 10800191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new method of plasmid DNA preparation by sucrose-mediated detergent lysis from Escherichia coli (gram-negative) and Staphylococcus aureus (gram-positive). Saha B; Saha D; Niyogi S; Bal M Anal Biochem; 1989 Feb; 176(2):344-9. PubMed ID: 2545109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A rapid method for RNA preparation from Gram-positive bacteria. Oh ET; So JS J Microbiol Methods; 2003 Mar; 52(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 12531509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A method for assessing efficiency of bacterial cell disruption and DNA release. de Bruin OM; Birnboim HC BMC Microbiol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):197. PubMed ID: 27566276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between a chimeric lysin ClyH and other enzymes for extracting DNA to detect methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus by quantitative PCR. Hu Y; Yang H; Wang J; Zhang Y; Yu J; Wei H World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Jan; 32(1):1. PubMed ID: 26596268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lytic enzyme, labiase for a broad range of Gram-positive bacteria and its application to analyze functional DNA/RNA. Niwa T; Kawamura Y; Katagiri Y; Ezaki T J Microbiol Methods; 2005 May; 61(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 15722152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved DNA extraction and purification with magnetic nanoparticles for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ernst C; Bartel A; Elferink JW; Huhn J; Eschbach E; Schönfeld K; Feßler AT; Oberheitmann B; Schwarz S Vet Microbiol; 2019 Mar; 230():45-48. PubMed ID: 30827403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of three different mycobacterial DNA isolation methods]. Alp A; Alp S; Saribaş Z; Hasçelik G Mikrobiyol Bul; 2007 Jul; 41(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 17933250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standardization of DNA extraction from sand flies: Application to genotyping by next generation sequencing. Casaril AE; de Oliveira LP; Alonso DP; de Oliveira EF; Gomes Barrios SP; de Oliveira Moura Infran J; Fernandes WS; Oshiro ET; Ferreira AMT; Ribolla PEM; de Oliveira AG Exp Parasitol; 2017 Jun; 177():66-72. PubMed ID: 28456690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficiency of chemical versus mechanical disruption methods of DNA extraction for the identification of oral Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Li X; Bosch-Tijhof CJ; Wei X; de Soet JJ; Crielaard W; Loveren CV; Deng DM J Int Med Res; 2020 May; 48(5):300060520925594. PubMed ID: 32459112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Rapid identification of bacteria by PCR and hybridization]. Ishiko H Nihon Rinsho; 1994 Feb; 52(2):344-9. PubMed ID: 8126883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Potential application of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for extraction of bacterial genomic DNA from contaminated food and environmental samples. Basu S; Chatterjee S; Bandyopadhyay A; Sarkar K J Sci Food Agric; 2013 Mar; 93(4):788-93. PubMed ID: 22806888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of a universal nucleic acid extraction procedure for PCR detection of gastroenteritis viruses in faecal specimens. Rasool NB; Monroe SS; Glass RI J Virol Methods; 2002 Feb; 100(1-2):1-16. PubMed ID: 11742648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Novel extraction strategy of ribosomal RNA and genomic DNA from cheese for PCR-based investigations. Bonaïti C; Parayre S; Irlinger F Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 107(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 16269194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Real-time quantitative broad-range PCR assay for detection of the 16S rRNA gene followed by sequencing for species identification. Zucol F; Ammann RA; Berger C; Aebi C; Altwegg M; Niggli FK; Nadal D J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 44(8):2750-9. PubMed ID: 16891488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficient isolation of total RNA from Clostridium without DNA contamination. Nuyts S; Van Mellaert L; Lambin P; Anné J J Microbiol Methods; 2001 Apr; 44(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 11240046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]