217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27058461)
21. The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography.
van Straten M; Deak P; Shrimpton PC; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4881-9. PubMed ID: 19994496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Coronary calcium scoring with MDCT: the radiation dose to the breast and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield.
Yilmaz MH; Yaşar D; Albayram S; Adaletli I; Ozer H; Ozbayrak M; Mihmanli I; Akman C
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jan; 61(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 16962280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Lens dose in routine head CT: comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms.
Nikupaavo U; Kaasalainen T; Reijonen V; Ahonen SM; Kortesniemi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 25539246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effects of bismuth breast shields in conjunction with automatic tube current modulation in CT imaging.
Servaes S; Zhu X
Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Oct; 43(10):1287-94. PubMed ID: 23700195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radiation dose reduction to the eye lens in head CT using tungsten functional paper and organ-based tube current modulation.
Kosaka H; Monzen H; Amano M; Tamura M; Hattori S; Kono Y; Nishimura Y
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 124():108814. PubMed ID: 31945674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reducing radiation dose to the female breast during CT coronary angiography: a simulation study comparing breast shielding, angular tube current modulation, reduced kV, and partial angle protocols using an unknown-location signal-detectability metric.
Rupcich F; Badal A; Popescu LM; Kyprianou I; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081921. PubMed ID: 23927335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of an organ-based tube current modulation tool in pediatric CT examinations.
Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5728-5737. PubMed ID: 32435930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reducing absorbed dose to eye lenses in head CT examinations: the effect of bismuth shielding.
Ciarmatori A; Nocetti L; Mistretta G; Zambelli G; Costi T
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2016 Jun; 39(2):583-9. PubMed ID: 27098155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of breast absorbed doses during thoracic computed tomography scan to evaluate the effectiveness of bismuth shielding.
Alonso TC; Mourão AP; Santana PC; da Silva TA
Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Nov; 117():55-57. PubMed ID: 27033028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. PAEDIATRIC NECK MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: THE EFFECT OF BISMUTH SHIELDING ON THYROID DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY.
Inkoom S; Papadakis AE; Raissaki M; Perisinakis K; Schandorf C; Fletcher JJ; Damilakis J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 173(4):361-373. PubMed ID: 26891787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the efficacy of a bismuth shield during CT examinations.
Colombo P; Pedroli G; Nicoloso M; Re S; Valvassori L; Vanzulli A
Radiol Med; 2004; 108(5-6):560-8. PubMed ID: 15723002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Radiation dose reduction to breast and thyroid during MDCT: effectiveness of an in-plane bismuth shield.
Hohl C; Wildberger JE; Süss C; Thomas C; Mühlenbruch G; Schmidt T; Honnef D; Günther RW; Mahnken AH
Acta Radiol; 2006 Jul; 47(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 16875333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. To shield or not to shield: application of bismuth breast shields.
Colletti PM; Micheli OA; Lee KH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):503-7. PubMed ID: 23436837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Radiation dose estimations to the thorax using organ-based dose modulation.
Lungren MP; Yoshizumi TT; Brady SM; Toncheva G; Anderson-Evans C; Lowry C; Zhou XR; Frush D; Hurwitz LM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):W65-73. PubMed ID: 22733933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effectiveness of bismuth breast shielding with protocol optimization in CT Thorax examination.
Karim MKA; Rahim NA; Matsubara K; Hashim S; Mhareb MHA; Musa Y
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(1):139-147. PubMed ID: 30584178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In-plane shielding for CT: effect of off-centering, automatic exposure control and shield-to-surface distance.
Kalra MK; Dang P; Singh S; Saini S; Shepard JA
Korean J Radiol; 2009; 10(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 19270862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reduction of eye lens radiation dose by orbital bismuth shielding in pediatric patients undergoing CT of the head: a Monte Carlo study.
Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Theocharopoulos N; Damilakis J; Gourtsoyiannis N
Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1024-30. PubMed ID: 15895586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of image noise levels, scout scan dose and lens shield on image quality and radiation exposure in z-axis dose-modulated neck MSCT on 16- and 64-slice Toshiba Aquilion scanners.
Bauknecht HC; Jach C; Bohner G; Meyer H; Scheurig C; Siebert E; Klingebiel R
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):439-43. PubMed ID: 19135816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Eye Shielding During Head CT Scans: Dose Reduction and Image Quality Evaluation.
Lee YH; Yang SH; Lin YK; Glickman RD; Chen CY; Chan WP
Acad Radiol; 2020 Nov; 27(11):1523-1530. PubMed ID: 32029375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Characterization and implementation of OSL dosimeters for use in evaluating the efficacy of organ-based tube current modulation for CT scans of the face and orbits.
Marsh RM; Silosky M
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1730-8. PubMed ID: 25832062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
