183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27058950)
41. Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.
Wang X; Zhang W; Yang X; Shao J; Zhou X; Yuan J
J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Oct; 44(10):1924-7. PubMed ID: 19853748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Implementation of hybrid-NOTES sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease : In a center for minimally invasive surgery].
Steinemann DC; Zerz A; Lamm SH
Chirurg; 2017 Jun; 88(6):518-524. PubMed ID: 27928602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Feasibility and Technique for Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Liver Resection: A Porcine Model.
Katagiri T; Otsuka Y; Horgan S; Sandler BJ; Jacobsen GR; Coker AM; Tsuchiya M; Maeda T; Kaneko H
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2017 Feb; 27(1):e6-e11. PubMed ID: 28030435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy using conventional instruments: the single working channel technique.
Pan Z; Jiang XH; Zhou JH; Ji ZL
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2013 Apr; 23(2):208-11. PubMed ID: 23579520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors.
Ball CG; Kortbeek JB; Kirkpatrick AW; Mitchell P
Surg Endosc; 2004 Jun; 18(6):969-73. PubMed ID: 15095081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Pure retroperitoneal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) transvaginal nephrectomy using standard laparoscopic instruments: a safety and feasibility study in a porcine model.
Wei D; Han Y; Li M; Wang Y; Chen Y; Luo Y; Jiang Y
BMC Urol; 2016 Jun; 16(1):29. PubMed ID: 27286863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Broad clinical utilization of NOTES: is it safe?
Horgan S; Meireles OR; Jacobsen GR; Sandler BJ; Ferreres A; Ramamoorthy S; Savides T; Katagiri T; Dotai T; Sedrak M; Majid SF; Nijhawan S; Talamini MA
Surg Endosc; 2013 Jun; 27(6):1872-80. PubMed ID: 23479251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Hybrid transgastric appendectomy is feasible but does not offer advantages compared with laparoscopic appendectomy: Results from the transgastric appendectomy study.
Schoenberg MB; Magdeburg R; Kienle P; Post S; Eisser PP; Kähler G
Surgery; 2017 Aug; 162(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 28442133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Female sexual function after pure transvaginal appendectomy: a cohort study.
Solomon D; Lentz R; Duffy AJ; Bell RL; Roberts KE
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 Jan; 16(1):183-6; discussion 186-7. PubMed ID: 21997432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Totally NOTES (T-NOTES) transvaginal cholecystectomy using two endoscopes: preliminary report.
de Sousa LH; de Sousa JA; de Sousa Filho LH; de Sousa MM; de Sousa VM; de Sousa AP; Zorron R
Surg Endosc; 2009 Nov; 23(11):2550-5. PubMed ID: 19343424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Comparison between transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a retrospective case-control study].
Hensel M; Schernikau U; Schmidt A; Arlt G
Zentralbl Chir; 2012 Feb; 137(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 20446249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: technically feasible and safe in all stages of acute appendicitis.
Vegunta RK; Ali A; Wallace LJ; Switzer DM; Pearl RH
Am Surg; 2004 Mar; 70(3):198-201; discussion 201-2. PubMed ID: 15055841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Safety Outcomes of NOTES Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Peng C; Ling Y; Ma C; Ma X; Fan W; Niu W; Niu J
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Oct; 26(5):347-353. PubMed ID: 27557339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [NOTES in visceral surgery : Current status].
Kähler G
Chirurg; 2017 Aug; 88(8):664-668. PubMed ID: 28477066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in the morbidly obese.
Panait L; Wood SG; Bell RL; Duffy AJ; Roberts KE
Surg Endosc; 2013 Jul; 27(7):2625-9. PubMed ID: 23355168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in the management of all stages of acute appendicitis in children: a retrospective study.
Tsai CC; Lee SY; Huang FC
Pediatr Neonatol; 2012 Oct; 53(5):289-94. PubMed ID: 23084720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Hospital variation in outcomes following appendectomy in a regional quality improvement program.
Jenkins PC; Oerline MK; Mullard AJ; Englesbe MJ; Campbell DA; Hemmila MR
Am J Surg; 2016 Nov; 212(5):857-862. PubMed ID: 27324383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [The minimal surgical access for appendectomy and complication of the acute appendicitis].
Sazhin AV; Mosin SV; Kodzhoglian AA; Medoev VV; Mirzoian AT; Iuldoshev AR; Laĭpanov BK; Dzusov MA
Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2012; (6):65-72. PubMed ID: 23012719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. [Open versus laparoscopic operation for perforated appendicitis--a comparative study].
Kapischke M; Bley K; Tepel J; Schulz T
Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Apr; 130(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 15849658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Pure transvaginal appendectomy versus traditional laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a prospective cohort study.
Roberts KE; Solomon D; Mirensky T; Silasi DA; Duffy AJ; Rutherford T; Longo WE; Bell RL
Ann Surg; 2012 Feb; 255(2):266-9. PubMed ID: 22167005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
