132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27059032)
1. Structured reporting ensures complete content and quick detection of essential data in pathology reports of oncological breast resection specimens.
Aumann K; Niermann K; Asberger J; Wellner U; Bronsert P; Erbes T; Hauschke D; Stickeler E; Gitsch G; Kayser G; Werner M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Apr; 156(3):495-500. PubMed ID: 27059032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The format type has impact on the quality of pathology reports of oncological lung resection specimens.
Aumann K; Kayser G; Amann D; Bronsert P; Hauschke D; Palade E; Passlick B; Werner M
Lung Cancer; 2013 Sep; 81(3):382-387. PubMed ID: 23790451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Template-based synoptic reports improve the quality of pathology reports of prostatectomy specimens.
Aumann K; Amann D; Gumpp V; Hauschke D; Kayser G; May AM; Wetterauer U; Werner M
Histopathology; 2012 Mar; 60(4):634-44. PubMed ID: 22276642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Functional Assessment of Synoptic Pathology Reporting for Ovarian Cancer.
Słodkowska J; Cierniak S; Patera J; Kopik J; Baranowski W; Markiewicz T; Murawski P; Buda I; Kozłowski W
Pathobiology; 2016; 83(2-3):70-8. PubMed ID: 27100104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.
Sluijter CE; van Lonkhuijzen LR; van Slooten HJ; Nagtegaal ID; Overbeek LI
Virchows Arch; 2016 Jun; 468(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 27097810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists?
Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 22032575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pathology reporting of breast cancer: trends in 1989-1999, following the introduction of mammographic screening in Western Australia.
Harvey JM; Sterrett GF; McEvoy S; Fritschi L; Jamrozik K; Ingram D; Joseph D; Dewar J; Byrne MJ;
Pathology; 2005 Oct; 37(5):341-6. PubMed ID: 16194843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reports - so what and who cares? A population-based satisfaction survey of 970 pathologists, surgeons, and oncologists.
Lankshear S; Srigley J; McGowan T; Yurcan M; Sawka C
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Nov; 137(11):1599-602. PubMed ID: 23432456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Accuracy and Speed of Information Identification by Nonpathologists in Synoptic Reports With Different Formats.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 141(3):418-422. PubMed ID: 28055242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of standardized structured reporting of pathology reports for breast cancer care.
Snoek JAA; Nagtegaal ID; Siesling S; van den Broek E; van Slooten HJ; Hugen N
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():178-182. PubMed ID: 36308925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinically relevant breast cancer reporting: using process measures to improve anatomic pathology reporting.
Hammond EH; Flinner RL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Nov; 121(11):1171-5. PubMed ID: 9372744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structured pathology reporting improves the macroscopic assessment of rectal tumour resection specimens.
King S; Dimech M; Johnstone S
Pathology; 2016 Jun; 48(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 27114373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of template format on the completeness of surgical pathology reports.
Renshaw SA; Mena-Allauca M; Touriz M; Renshaw A; Gould EW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Jan; 138(1):121-4. PubMed ID: 24377820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histopathology reporting of breast cancer in Queensland: the impact on the quality of reporting as a result of the introduction of recommendations.
Austin R; Thompson B; Coory M; Walpole E; Francis G; Fritschi L
Pathology; 2009; 41(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 19404849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variability in gross and microscopic pathology reporting in excisional biopsies of breast cancer tissue.
Apple SK
Breast J; 2006; 12(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16509839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation in breast cancer grading: the effect of creating awareness through laboratory-specific and pathologist-specific feedback reports in 16 734 patients with breast cancer.
van Dooijeweert C; van Diest PJ; Baas IO; van der Wall E; Deckers IA
J Clin Pathol; 2020 Dec; 73(12):793-799. PubMed ID: 32276993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Standardization of the surgical pathology report: formats, templates, and synoptic reports.
Leslie KO; Rosai J
Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Nov; 11(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 7878300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Synoptic reporting increases quality of upper gastrointestinal cancer pathology reports.
Baranov NS; Nagtegaal ID; van Grieken NCT; Verhoeven RHA; Voorham QJM; Rosman C; van der Post RS
Virchows Arch; 2019 Aug; 475(2):255-259. PubMed ID: 31144018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Synoptic tool for reporting of hematological and lymphoid neoplasms based on World Health Organization classification and College of American Pathologists checklist.
Mohanty SK; Piccoli AL; Devine LJ; Patel AA; William GC; Winters SB; Becich MJ; Parwani AV
BMC Cancer; 2007 Jul; 7():144. PubMed ID: 17672904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
