268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27059685)
21. Network meta-analysis of studies comparing closure devices for femoral access after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Iannaccone M; Saint-Hilary G; Menardi D; Vadalà P; Bernardi A; Bianco M; Montefusco A; Omedè P; D'Amico S; Piazza F; Scacciatella P; D'Amico M; Moretti C; Biondi-Zoccai G; Gasparini M; Gaita F; D'Ascenzo F
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2018 Oct; 19(10):586-596. PubMed ID: 30045086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A regional pharmacoinvasive PCI strategy incorporating selected bleeding avoidance strategies.
Chava S; Raza S; El-Haddad MA; Priest J; Ashikaga T; Dauerman HL
Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Jan; 26(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 25279566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of radial access versus femoral access with the use of a vascular closure device for the prevention of vascular complications and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Téblick A; Vanderbruggen W; Vandendriessche T; Bosmans J; Haine SEF; Miljoen H; Segers V; Wouters K; Vrints C; Claeys MJ
Acta Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 73(3):241-247. PubMed ID: 28851255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Impact of Bleeding Avoidance Strategies on Hospital-Level Variation in Bleeding Rates Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry.
Vora AN; Peterson ED; McCoy LA; Garratt KN; Kutcher MA; Marso SP; Roe MT; Messenger JC; Rao SV
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 9(8):771-779. PubMed ID: 27101904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access in Patients Undergoing Rescue Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Fibrinolytic Therapy.
Kadakia MB; Rao SV; McCoy L; Choudhuri PS; Sherwood MW; Lilly S; Kobayashi T; Kolansky DM; Wilensky RL; Yeh RW; Giri J
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Dec; 8(14):1868-76. PubMed ID: 26718516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients.
de Andrade PB; E Mattos LA; Tebet MA; Rinaldi FS; Esteves VC; Nogueira EF; França JÍ; de Andrade MV; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Abizaid AA; Sousa AG
Trials; 2013 Dec; 14():435. PubMed ID: 24345099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Percutaneous closure devices do not reduce the risk of major access site complications in patients undergoing elective carotid stent placement.
McDonald JS; Kallmes DF; Lanzino G; Cloft HJ
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1057-62. PubMed ID: 23796093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Identification of hospital outliers in bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Hess CN; Rao SV; McCoy LA; Neely ML; Singh M; Spertus JA; Krone RJ; Weaver WD; Peterson ED
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2015 Jan; 8(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 25424242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Editor's Choice - Arteriotomy Closure Devices in EVAR, TEVAR, and TAVR: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials and Cohort Studies.
Vierhout BP; Pol RA; El Moumni M; Zeebregts CJ
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2017 Jul; 54(1):104-115. PubMed ID: 28438400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical outcomes of femoral closure compared to radial compression devices following percutaneous coronary intervention: the FERARI study.
Fastner C; Behnes M; Ünsal M; El-Battrawy I; Ansari U; Mashayekhi K; Hoffmann U; Lang S; Kuschyk J; Borggrefe M; Akin I
Heart Vessels; 2017 May; 32(5):520-530. PubMed ID: 27803954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Vascular Closure Devices Versus Manual Compression After Femoral Artery Puncture in Women.
Gewalt SM; Helde SM; Ibrahim T; Mayer K; Schmidt R; Bott-Flügel L; Hoppe K; Ott I; Hieber J; Morath T; Byrne RA; Kufner S; Cassese S; Hoppmann P; Fusaro M; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A; Schüpke S;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 11(8):e006074. PubMed ID: 30354782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Same-day discharge after coronary stenting and femoral artery device closure: A randomized study in stable and low-risk acute coronary syndrome patients.
Clavijo LC; Cortes GA; Jolly A; Tun H; Mehra A; Gaglia MA; Shavelle D; Matthews RV
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016; 17(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 27157292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A novel, minimally invasive access technique versus standard 18-gauge needle set for femoral access.
Ben-Dor I; Maluenda G; Mahmoudi M; Torguson R; Xue Z; Bernardo N; Lindsay J; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jun; 79(7):1180-5. PubMed ID: 22334384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Femoral access-related complications during percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation comparing single versus double Prostar XL device closure.
Saleh N; De Palma R; Settergren M; Rück A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Dec; 86(7):1255-61. PubMed ID: 26332528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Early ambulation after percutaneous femoral access with use of closure devices and hemostatic agents.
Engelbert TL; Scholten A; Thompson K; Spivack A; Kansal N
Ann Vasc Surg; 2010 May; 24(4):518-23. PubMed ID: 20451795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Suitability of a 7-F ExoSeal Vascular Closure Device for Femoral Artery Punctures Made by 8-F or 9-F Introducer Sheaths.
Goto S; Ohshima T; Ishikawa K; Yamamoto T; Nishizawa T; Shimato S; Kato K
J Endovasc Ther; 2017 Aug; 24(4):516-520. PubMed ID: 28743227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of a collagen plug arterial closure device with manual compression after endovascular interventions for peripheral artery disease.
Fokkema TM; Minnee RC; Kock GA; Blomjous JG; Vahl AC; Leijdekkers VJ
J Vasc Surg; 2016 Jul; 64(1):104-108.e1. PubMed ID: 27038835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A randomized comparison of a novel bioabsorbable vascular closure device versus manual compression in the achievement of hemostasis after percutaneous femoral procedures: the ECLIPSE (Ensure's Vascular Closure Device Speeds Hemostasis Trial).
Wong SC; Bachinsky W; Cambier P; Stoler R; Aji J; Rogers JH; Hermiller J; Nair R; Hutman H; Wang H;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Aug; 2(8):785-93. PubMed ID: 19695549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Safety and efficacy of using vascular closure devices for hemostasis on sheath removal after a transfemoral artery percutaneous coronary intervention.
Su SF; Chang MY; Wu MS; Liao YC
Jpn J Nurs Sci; 2019 Apr; 16(2):172-183. PubMed ID: 30044037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Percutaneous Plug-Based Arteriotomy Closure Device for Large-Bore Access: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Van Mieghem NM; Latib A; van der Heyden J; van Gils L; Daemen J; Sorzano T; Ligthart J; Witberg K; de Kroon T; Maor N; Mangieri A; Montorfano M; de Jaegere PP; Colombo A; Roubin G
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 10(6):613-619. PubMed ID: 28335899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
