These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27061853)

  • 21. Evaluating factors that affect the shade-matching ability of dentists, dental staff members and laypeople.
    Capa N; Malkondu O; Kazazoglu E; Calikkocaoglu S
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jan; 141(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 20045824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating tooth color matching ability of dental students.
    Jaju RA; Nagai S; Karimbux N; Da Silva JD
    J Dent Educ; 2010 Sep; 74(9):1002-10. PubMed ID: 20837742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lightness, chroma and hue differences on visual shade matching.
    Pecho OE; Pérez MM; Ghinea R; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1362-1373. PubMed ID: 27614615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Shade matching performance of dental students with three various lighting conditions.
    Nakhaei M; Ghanbarzadeh J; Keyvanloo S; Alavi S; Jafarzadeh H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 23579903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing the effectiveness of shade measurement by intraoral scanner, digital spectrophotometer, and visual shade assessment.
    Czigola A; Róth I; Vitai V; Fehér D; Hermann P; Borbély J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Dec; 33(8):1166-1174. PubMed ID: 34397163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
    Öngül D; Şermet B; Balkaya MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical color match of porcelain visual shade-matching systems.
    Wee AG; Kang EY; Jere D; Beck FM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(6):351-7; discussion 358. PubMed ID: 16417829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of time consumption and color matching results of different dental occupational groups.
    Ortolan SM; Persic S; Celebic A; Mehulic K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 23998147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software.
    Schropp L
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19141046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus.
    Paravina RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 12475156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of Gender on Visual Shade Matching in Dentistry.
    Pecho OE; Ghinea R; Perez MM; Della Bona A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Apr; 29(2):E15-E23. PubMed ID: 28185440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of background/surrounding area on accuracy of visual color matching.
    Dudea D; Gasparik C; Botos A; Alb F; Irimie A; Paravina RD
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jul; 20(6):1167-73. PubMed ID: 26459306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Tooth color matching systems and communication with dental laboratory in indirect restorations: 2011 update].
    Ginzburg M; Gilboa I
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2012 Jan; 29(1):28-34, 64. PubMed ID: 22991874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Shade matching quality among dental students using visual and instrumental methods.
    Bahannan SA
    J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 24252802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study.
    Liberato WF; Barreto IC; Costa PP; de Almeida CC; Pimentel W; Tiossi R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):271-275. PubMed ID: 30722987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Application and comparison of two shade guide training systems].
    Liu F; Xu TK; Xu MM; Feng HL; Song GY
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 44(11):645-8. PubMed ID: 20079262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Color perceptibility and validity of silicon carbide-based protective coatings for dental ceramics.
    Fares C; Elhassani R; Ren F; Cabrera AR; Chai I; Neal D; Hsu SM; Esquivel-Upshaw JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):918-924. PubMed ID: 33483139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of visual shade matching and photographic shade analysis.
    Rondón LF; Ramírez R; Pecho OE
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Mar; 34(2):374-382. PubMed ID: 35128799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of gender and clinical experience on shade perception.
    Aswini KK; Ramanarayanan V; Rejithan A; Sajeev R; Suresh R
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Nov; 31(6):608-612. PubMed ID: 31456329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparison of shade matching accuracy of tabs of shadeguide and tabs out of shadeguide].
    Xu MM; Xu TK; Liu F; Ren SX; Feng HL
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jul; 44(7):430-2. PubMed ID: 19957578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.