773 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27062881)
41. Does Measurement of Corticospinal Tract Involvement Add Value to Clinical Behavioral Biomarkers in Predicting Motor Recovery after Stroke?
Lim JY; Oh MK; Park J; Paik NJ
Neural Plast; 2020; 2020():8883839. PubMed ID: 33354207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. 3-Dimensional printing in rehabilitation: feasibility of printing an upper extremity gross motor function assessment tool.
Kapadia N; Myers M; Musselman K; Wang RH; Yurkewich A; Popovic MR
Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Jan; 20(1):2. PubMed ID: 33402170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Predictive factors of upper limb motor recovery for stroke survivors admitted to a rehabilitation program.
Wu J; Zhang J; Bai Z; Chen S; Cai S
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 Dec; 56(6):706-712. PubMed ID: 32667149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Reliability and validity of Japanese version of Fugl-Meyer assessment for the lower extremities.
Nakazono T; Takahashi K; Suzuki Y; Mizuno K; Nomura Y; Hiraga Y; Matsumoto S; Nishiyama K; Fukuda M
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2022 Mar; 29(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 33724162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Psychometric properties of the sensory scale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in stroke patients.
Lin JH; Hsueh IP; Sheu CF; Hsieh CL
Clin Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 18(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 15180122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Validation of French upper limb Erasmus modified Nottingham Sensory Assessment in stroke.
Villepinte C; Catella E; Martin M; Hidalgo S; Téchené S; Lebely C; Castel-Lacanal E; de Boissezon X; Chih H; Gasq D
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2019 Jan; 62(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 29660413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Minimal clinically important difference of the lower-extremity fugl-meyer assessment in chronic-stroke.
Pandian S; Arya KN; Kumar D
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 23(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 27086865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Responsiveness of two upper extremity function instruments for stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation.
Hsueh IP; Hsieh CL
Clin Rehabil; 2002 Sep; 16(6):617-24. PubMed ID: 12392336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Psychometric properties and administration of the wrist/hand subscales of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in minimally impaired upper extremity hemiparesis in stroke.
Page SJ; Levine P; Hade E
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Dec; 93(12):2373-6.e5. PubMed ID: 22759831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Does an association exist between the hierarchical motor components of upper and lower limbs in stroke?
Arya KN; Pandian S; Kumar D
J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2016 Jul; 20(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 27634071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Is the long form of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale more responsive than the short form in patients with stroke?
Chen KL; Chen CT; Chou YT; Shih CL; Koh CL; Hsieh CL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 May; 95(5):941-9. PubMed ID: 24491466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Upper Extremity Functional Evaluation by Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scoring Using Depth-Sensing Camera in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients.
Kim WS; Cho S; Baek D; Bang H; Paik NJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158640. PubMed ID: 27367518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Convergent Validity and Responsiveness of the SULCS.
Knutson JS; Friedl AS; Hansen KM; Hisel TZ; Harley MY
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Jan; 100(1):140-143.e1. PubMed ID: 30148996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Development of a computerized adaptive testing system of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale in stroke patients.
Hou WH; Shih CL; Chou YT; Sheu CF; Lin JH; Wu HC; Hsueh IP; Hsieh CL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 93(6):1014-20. PubMed ID: 22440481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effects of an assist-as-needed equipped Tenodesis-Induced-Grip Exoskeleton Robot (TIGER) on upper limb function in patients with chronic stroke.
Hsu HY; Koh CL; Yang KC; Lin YC; Hsu CH; Su FC; Kuo LC
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2024 Jan; 21(1):5. PubMed ID: 38173006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The Spanish lower extremity functional scale: a reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire to assess musculoskeletal disorders in the lower extremity.
Cruz-Díaz D; Lomas-Vega R; Osuna-Pérez MC; Hita-Contreras F; Fernández ÁD; Martínez-Amat A
Disabil Rehabil; 2014; 36(23):2005-11. PubMed ID: 24593163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Prediction of Motor Recovery in the Upper Extremity for Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Occupational Therapy Goal Setting in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Retrospective Analysis of Prospectively Collected Data.
Hamaguchi T; Yamada N; Hada T; Abo M
Front Neurol; 2020; 11():581186. PubMed ID: 33193036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Does noninvasive brain stimulation combined with other therapies improve upper extremity motor impairment, functional performance, and participation in activities of daily living after stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.
Ahmed I; Mustafaoglu R; Benkhalifa N; Yakhoub YH
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2023 Apr; 30(3):213-234. PubMed ID: 35112659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Translating measurement findings into rehabilitation practice: an example using Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity with patients following stroke.
Velozo CA; Woodbury ML
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2011; 48(10):1211-22. PubMed ID: 22234665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The Italian version of the Trunk Impairment Scale: development and psychometric properties.
Lombardi B; Orioli A; Casavola D; Paci M
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Aug; 53(4):516-520. PubMed ID: 28382809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
