These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27063205)

  • 1. Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision?
    Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():6-15. PubMed ID: 27063205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GRADE guidance 35: update on rating imprecision for assessing contextualized certainty of evidence and making decisions.
    Schünemann HJ; Neumann I; Hultcrantz M; Brignardello-Petersen R; Zeng L; Murad MH; Izcovich A; Morgano GP; Baldeh T; Santesso N; Cuello CG; Mbuagbaw L; Guyatt G; Wiercioch W; Piggott T; De Beer H; Vinceti M; Mathioudakis AG; Mayer MG; Mustafa R; Filippini T; Iorio A; Nieuwlaat R; Marcucci M; Coello PA; Bonovas S; Piovani D; Tomlinson G; Akl EA;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Oct; 150():225-242. PubMed ID: 35934266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using GRADE to respond to health questions with different levels of urgency.
    Thayer KA; Schünemann HJ
    Environ Int; 2016; 92-93():585-9. PubMed ID: 27126781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using systematic reviews in guideline development: the GRADE approach.
    Zhang Y; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 30006970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. GRADE: Assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health.
    Morgan RL; Thayer KA; Bero L; Bruce N; Falck-Ytter Y; Ghersi D; Guyatt G; Hooijmans C; Langendam M; Mandrioli D; Mustafa RA; Rehfuess EA; Rooney AA; Shea B; Silbergeld EK; Sutton P; Wolfe MS; Woodruff TJ; Verbeek JH; Holloway AC; Santesso N; Schünemann HJ
    Environ Int; 2016; 92-93():611-6. PubMed ID: 26827182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conclusiveness resolves the conflict between quality of evidence and imprecision in GRADE.
    Anttila S; Persson J; Vareman N; Sahlin NE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():1-5. PubMed ID: 27063204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence.
    Schünemann HJ; Cuello C; Akl EA; Mustafa RA; Meerpohl JJ; Thayer K; Morgan RL; Gartlehner G; Kunz R; Katikireddi SV; Sterne J; Higgins JP; Guyatt G;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():105-114. PubMed ID: 29432858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Integrative assessment of evidence in healthcare: the GRADE system].
    Schünemann H
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2009; 103(5):261-8. PubMed ID: 19645339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) notes: extremely serious, GRADE's terminology for rating down by three levels.
    Piggott T; Morgan RL; Cuello-Garcia CA; Santesso N; Mustafa RA; Meerpohl JJ; Schünemann HJ;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 120():116-120. PubMed ID: 31866468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains.
    Zhang Y; Coello PA; Guyatt GH; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Akl EA; Hazlewood G; Pardo-Hernandez H; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Qaseem A; Williams JW; Tugwell P; Flottorp S; Chang Y; Zhang Y; Mustafa RA; Rojas MX; Xie F; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():83-93. PubMed ID: 29800687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies-from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations.
    Schünemann HJ; Mustafa RA; Brozek J; Santesso N; Bossuyt PM; Steingart KR; Leeflang M; Lange S; Trenti T; Langendam M; Scholten R; Hooft L; Murad MH; Jaeschke R; Rutjes A; Singh J; Helfand M; Glasziou P; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Akl EA; Deeks JJ; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():69-82. PubMed ID: 30738926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GRADE guidance 36: updates to GRADE's approach to addressing inconsistency.
    Guyatt G; Zhao Y; Mayer M; Briel M; Mustafa R; Izcovich A; Hultcrantz M; Iorio A; Alba AC; Foroutan F; Sun X; Schunemann H; DeBeer H; Akl EA; Christensen R; Schandelmaier S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 158():70-83. PubMed ID: 36898507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
    Guyatt G; Oxman AD; Akl EA; Kunz R; Vist G; Brozek J; Norris S; Falck-Ytter Y; Glasziou P; DeBeer H; Jaeschke R; Rind D; Meerpohl J; Dahm P; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):383-94. PubMed ID: 21195583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health.
    Schünemann HJ; Mustafa R; Brozek J; Santesso N; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G; Scholten R; Langendam M; Leeflang MM; Akl EA; Singh JA; Meerpohl J; Hultcrantz M; Bossuyt P; Oxman AD;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():89-98. PubMed ID: 26931285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [How to interpret the certainty of evidence based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation)].
    Schwingshackl L; Rüschemeyer G; Meerpohl JJ
    Urologe A; 2021 Apr; 60(4):444-454. PubMed ID: 33620513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adding a "GRADE" to the quality appraisal of rheumatoid arthritis guidelines identifies limitations beyond AGREE-II.
    Hazlewood GS; Akhavan P; Schieir O; Marshall D; Tomlinson G; Bykerk V; Bombardier C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):1274-85. PubMed ID: 25240769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables].
    Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Perleth M; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann H
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(5):357-68. PubMed ID: 22818160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [GRADE guidelines: 6. Rating the quality of evidence: imprecision].
    Kulig M; Perleth M; Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(9):677-88. PubMed ID: 23200212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health].
    Morche J; Conrad S; Passon A; Perleth M; Gartlehner G; Meerpohl JJ; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 May; 133():58-66. PubMed ID: 29673801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence to Decision framework provides a structured "roadmap" for making GRADE guidelines recommendations.
    Li SA; Alexander PE; Reljic T; Cuker A; Nieuwlaat R; Wiercioch W; Guyatt G; Schünemann HJ; Djulbegovic B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 104():103-112. PubMed ID: 30253221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.