These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27063407)

  • 1. Demand in rats responding under duration-based schedules of reinforcement.
    Peck S; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2016 Jul; 128():47-52. PubMed ID: 27063407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of resetting and nonresetting contingencies in progressive-duration schedules.
    Valois M; Peck S; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2017 Sep; 142():119-125. PubMed ID: 28711521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response duration is sensitive to both immediate and delayed reinforcement.
    Byrne T; Sarno B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jan; 111(1):94-115. PubMed ID: 30565230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Control of response duration by delayed reinforcers: A systematic replication.
    Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2019 Oct; 167():103920. PubMed ID: 31374227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reinforcer magnitude and demand under fixed-ratio schedules with domestic hens.
    Grant AA; Foster TM; Temple W; Jackson S; Kinloch J; Poling A
    Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():199-210. PubMed ID: 24393654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acquisition of operant behavior in rats with delayed reinforcement: A retractable-lever procedure.
    McNamara AA; Johnson LE; Tate C; Chiang T; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Feb; 111():37-41. PubMed ID: 25464338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of progressive hold and progressive response schedules of reinforcement.
    Alvarez-Sekely CS; Toscano-Zapien AL; Salles-Ize P; Zepeda-Ruiz WA; Lopez-Guzman MA; Velazquez-Martinez DN
    Behav Processes; 2023 Feb; 205():104822. PubMed ID: 36669746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Demand equations for qualitatively different foods under fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of three data conversions.
    Foster TM; Sumpter CE; Temple W; Flevill A; Poling A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Nov; 92(3):305-26. PubMed ID: 20514164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A progressive-duration schedule of reinforcement.
    Gulotta KB; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():93-7. PubMed ID: 26536304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interreinforcement time, work time, and the postreinforcement pause.
    Rider DP; Kametani NN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Sep; 42(2):305-19. PubMed ID: 16812391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of delays and ratio requirements in self-control choice.
    Grossbard CL; Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 May; 45(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 3711777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavior of rats under fixed consecutive number schedules: effects of drugs of abuse.
    Snodgrass SH; Hardin JL; McMillan DE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Jul; 68(1):117-32. PubMed ID: 9241864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Studies of wheel-running reinforcement: parameters of Herrnstein's (1970) response-strength equation vary with schedule order.
    Belke TW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 May; 73(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 10866355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intermittent reinforcement of a continuous response.
    Rider DP; Kametani NN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Jan; 47(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 16812472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of reinforcement rate and delay on the acquisition of lever pressing by rats.
    Bruner CA; Avila R; Acuña L; Gallardo LM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Jan; 69(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 9465413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response-reinforcer contiguity versus response-rate-reinforcer-rate covariance in rats' lever pressing: Support for a multiscale view.
    Baum WM; Aparicio CF
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 May; 113(3):530-548. PubMed ID: 32215922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying the molecular structure of behavior: separate effects of caffeine, cocaine, and adenosine agonists on interresponse times and lever-press durations.
    Newland MC
    Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Feb; 8(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 9832996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioral economics and within-session changes in responding.
    McSweeney FK; Swindell S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Nov; 72(3):355-71. PubMed ID: 10605103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response acquisition with signaled delayed reinforcement in a rodent model of ADHD.
    Hand DJ; Fox AT; Reilly MP
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Dec; 213(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 20438767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.