199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27063439)
1. Acceptability of the combined oral contraceptive pill among Hong Kong women.
Lo SS; Fan SY
Hong Kong Med J; 2016 Jun; 22(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 27063439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mothers' attitude to the use of a combined oral contraceptive pill by their daughters for menstrual disorders or contraception.
Yiu KW; Chan SS; Chung TK
Hong Kong Med J; 2017 Apr; 23(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 28232640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Women's knowledge of taking oral contraceptive pills correctly and of emergency contraception: effect of providing information leaflets in general practice.
Smith LF; Whitfield MJ
Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Aug; 45(397):409-14. PubMed ID: 7576845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acceptability of an on-demand pericoital oral contraceptive pill: a systematic scoping review.
Bell S; Gibbs S; Winskell A; Villarino X; Gill H; Little K
Reprod Health; 2024 Jun; 21(1):93. PubMed ID: 38943120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of educational leaflets and questions on knowledge of contraception in women taking the combined contraceptive pill: randomised controlled trial.
Little P; Griffin S; Kelly J; Dickson N; Sadler C
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7149):1948-52. PubMed ID: 9641933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the October 1995 pill scare in Grampian.
Flett G; Gurney E; McKessock L; Reid J
Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Apr; 24(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 9719702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women's perceptions of the pill's potential health risks in Sri Lanka.
Thapa S; Salgado M; Fortney JA; Grubb GS; De Silva V
Asia Pac Popul J; 1987 Sep; 2(3):39-56. PubMed ID: 12268936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective multicentre study comparing levonorgestrel implants with a combined contraceptive pill: final results.
Kirkman RJ; Bromham DR; O'Connor TP; Sahota JE
Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):36-40. PubMed ID: 10454652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Oral contraceptives: knowledge and compliance].
Koch T; Marslew U; Nielsen MR
Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Nov; 155(44):3546-50. PubMed ID: 8236575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. User characteristics and oral contraceptive compliance in Egypt.
Trottier DA; Potter LS; Taylor BA; Glover LH
Stud Fam Plann; 1994; 25(5):284-92. PubMed ID: 7871553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The contraceptive practices of women seeking termination of pregnancy in an Auckland clinic.
Young LK; Farquhar CM; McCowan LM; Roberts HE; Taylor J
N Z Med J; 1994 May; 107(978):189-92. PubMed ID: 8196861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Depo Provera. Position paper on clinical use, effectiveness and side effects.
Bigrigg A; Evans M; Gbolade B; Newton J; Pollard L; Szarewski A; Thomas C; Walling M
Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 10454658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pill-a-month as an oral contraceptive.
Hefnawi F; Hassanein M; Younis N
Egypt Popul Fam Plann Rev; 1972 Jun; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 12256024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The oral contraceptive pill: use, user satisfaction, side effects and fears among Manawatu women.
Trlin AD; Perry PE
N Z Med J; 1982 Oct; 95(717):700-3. PubMed ID: 6959020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospects for increased contraceptive pill use in Japan.
Ogawa N; Retherford RD
Stud Fam Plann; 1991; 22(6):378-83. PubMed ID: 1792677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relevance of ethnic monitoring in the experience of Haringey Healthcare NHS trust community family planning clinics.
Christopher E
Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jan; 24(4):123-7. PubMed ID: 10023096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Duration of use of oral contraception in the United States, 1960-65.
Westoff CF; Ryder NB
Public Health Rep (1896); 1968 Apr; 83(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 4967117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Individualization of low-dose oral contraceptives. Pharmacological principles and practical indications for oral contraceptives].
Cianci A; De Leo V
Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Aug; 59(4):415-25. PubMed ID: 17923832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical evaluation of 1,668 cycles of triphasic oral contraception (Trigynon). Multicentric Belgian study].
Gaspard U; Bouffioux R; Werbrouck-Navette J
Rev Med Liege; 1982 Nov; 37(22):768-76. PubMed ID: 6818654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The CHOICE study (Contraceptive Health Research Of Informed Choice Experience)--an educational research program for Polish women planning combined hormonal contraceptives use].
Tomaszewski J; Paszkowski T; Debski R; Kotarski J; Skrzypulec-Plinta V; Spaczyński RZ; Pawelczyk L
Ginekol Pol; 2012 Jun; 83(6):417-23. PubMed ID: 22880460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
