These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27064271)

  • 1. [The Influence of Hearing Loss Represented by Standard Audiogram Types to Unaided APHAB Scores].
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Kappe T; Wollenberg B; Schlattmann P; Schönweiler R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2016 Aug; 95(8):540-5. PubMed ID: 27064271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of frequency-dependent hearing loss to unaided APHAB scores.
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Wollenberg B; Kappe T; Schlattmann P; Schönweiler R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 273(11):3587-3593. PubMed ID: 26975446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity and specificity of the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB).
    Löhler J; Gräbner F; Wollenberg B; Schlattmann P; Schönweiler R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 274(10):3593-3598. PubMed ID: 28756570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores.
    Löhler J; Wollenberg B; Schlattmann P; Hoang N; Schönweiler R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 274(3):1345-1349. PubMed ID: 27858146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Audiometric correlates of the unaided APHAB.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Sep; 14(7):361-71. PubMed ID: 14620610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effectiveness of the directional microphone in the Oticon Medical Ponto Pro in participants with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):701-13. PubMed ID: 24131606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between acceptable noise level and the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.
    Freyaldenhoven MC; Nabelek AK; Tampas JW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Feb; 51(1):136-46. PubMed ID: 18230861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Dependency of APHAB score in the EC
    Löhler J; Wegner O; Wollenberg B; Schönweiler R
    HNO; 2018 Jul; 66(7):550-558. PubMed ID: 29532108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical Application and Psychometric Properties of a Swedish Translation of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit.
    Brännström KJ; Andersson K; Sandgren O; Whitling S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Oct; 31(9):656-665. PubMed ID: 33296928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1995 Apr; 16(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 7789669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Self-rated efficacy in bilateral aural atresia patients using bone-anchored hearing aid].
    Yue F; Yibei W; Zhen W; Pu W; Xiaowei C
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 50(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 26268492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms.
    Johnson JA; Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 19692903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Correlation between the APHAB questionnaire and the Freiburg monosyllabic test without + with noise].
    Löhler J; Sippel M; Walther LE; Schönweiler R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2022 Apr; 101(4):304-309. PubMed ID: 34157776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [APHAB scores for individual assessment of the benefit of hearing aid fitting].
    Löhler J; Wollenberg B; Schönweiler R
    HNO; 2017 Nov; 65(11):901-909. PubMed ID: 28455538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Development and use of an APHAB database].
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Kappe T; Schlattmann P; Wollenberg B; Schönweiler R
    HNO; 2014 Oct; 62(10):735-45. PubMed ID: 25231698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) as a hearing aid outcome measure.
    Surr RK; Kolb JA; Cord MT; Garrus NP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Oct; 10(9):489-95. PubMed ID: 10522622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral inner ear deafness: a study of 20 patients.
    Hol MK; Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(5):274-81. PubMed ID: 15316200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.
    Abrams HB; Chisolm TH; McManus M; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):768-78. PubMed ID: 23169194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Distribution and Scattering of APHAB Answers Before and After Hearing Aid Fitting].
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Wollenberg B; Schönweiler R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2016 Nov; 95(11):768-773. PubMed ID: 26743978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users.
    Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.