These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27064383)

  • 1. Can Radiologic Staging With Multiparametric MRI Enhance the Accuracy of the Partin Tables in Predicting Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer?
    Gupta RT; Brown AF; Silverman RK; Tay KJ; Madden JF; George DJ; Polascik TJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 27064383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing 3-T multiparametric MRI and the Partin tables to predict organ-confined prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
    Gupta RT; Faridi KF; Singh AA; Passoni NM; Garcia-Reyes K; Madden JF; Polascik TJ
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 32(8):1292-9. PubMed ID: 24863013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adding multiparametric MRI to the MSKCC and Partin nomograms for primary prostate cancer: Improving local tumor staging?
    Jansen BHE; Nieuwenhuijzen JA; Oprea-Lager DE; Yska MJ; Lont AP; van Moorselaar RJA; Vis AN
    Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):181.e1-181.e6. PubMed ID: 30558983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are Partin tables suitable for Chinese patients with prostate cancer?
    Shen XC; Qiu YQ; Zheng YC; Zhang SZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Nov; 125(21):3795-9. PubMed ID: 23106876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re: Can Radiologic Staging with Multiparametric MRI Enhance the Accuracy of the Partin Tables in Predicting Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer?
    Siegel C
    J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):152-153. PubMed ID: 27979509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.
    Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ
    BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One-Stop-Shop Whole-Body
    Thalgott M; Düwel C; Rauscher I; Heck MM; Haller B; Gafita A; Gschwend JE; Schwaiger M; Maurer T; Eiber M
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1850-1856. PubMed ID: 29794224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Incremental Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Staging before Radical Prostatectomy.
    Morlacco A; Sharma V; Viers BR; Rangel LJ; Carlson RE; Froemming AT; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2017 May; 71(5):701-704. PubMed ID: 27576750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine learning for improved pathological staging of prostate cancer: a performance comparison on a range of classifiers.
    Regnier-Coudert O; McCall J; Lothian R; Lam T; McClinton S; N'dow J
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 May; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 22206941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiparametric MRI Improves Accuracy of Clinical Nomograms for Predicting Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer.
    Feng TS; Sharif-Afshar AR; Wu J; Li Q; Luthringer D; Saouaf R; Kim HL
    Urology; 2015 Aug; 86(2):332-7. PubMed ID: 26194289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Added Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Clinical Nomograms for Predicting Adverse Pathology in Prostate Cancer.
    Rayn KN; Bloom JB; Gold SA; Hale GR; Baiocco JA; Mehralivand S; Czarniecki M; Sabarwal VK; Valera V; Wood BJ; Merino MJ; Choyke P; Turkbey B; Pinto PA
    J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1041-1047. PubMed ID: 29852182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of prostate cancer in comparison to the Partin tables.
    Augustin H; Fritz GA; Ehammer T; Auprich M; Pummer K
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jun; 50(5):562-9. PubMed ID: 19455449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prostate MRI added to CAPRA, MSKCC and Partin cancer nomograms significantly enhances the prediction of adverse findings and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Sandeman K; Eineluoto JT; Pohjonen J; Erickson A; Kilpeläinen TP; Järvinen P; Santti H; Petas A; Matikainen M; Marjasuo S; Kenttämies A; Mirtti T; Rannikko A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235779. PubMed ID: 32645056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The newer the better? Comparison of the 1997 and 2001 partin tables for pathologic stage prediction of prostate cancer in China.
    Gao X; Ren S; Lu X; Xu C; Sun Y
    Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):1096-101. PubMed ID: 18822453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using support vector machine analysis to assess PartinMR: A new prediction model for organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Wang J; Wu CJ; Bao ML; Zhang J; Shi HB; Zhang YD
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):499-506. PubMed ID: 29437268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.
    Somford DM; Hamoen EH; Fütterer JJ; van Basten JP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Vreuls W; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Kiemeney LA; Barentsz JO; Witjes JA
    J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1728-34. PubMed ID: 23680307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging versus Partin tables and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering cancer center nomogram in risk stratification of patients with prostate cancer referred to external beam radiation therapy.
    Girometti R; Pancot M; Signor MA; Urbani M; Balestreri L; Zuiani C
    Radiol Med; 2018 Oct; 123(10):778-787. PubMed ID: 29752647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Head-to-head comparison between multiparametric MRI, the partin tables, memorial sloan kettering cancer center nomogram, and CAPRA score in predicting extraprostatic cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Zanelli E; Giannarini G; Cereser L; Zuiani C; Como G; Pizzolitto S; Crestani A; Valotto C; Ficarra V; Girometti R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 50(5):1604-1613. PubMed ID: 30957321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of accuracy between the Partin tables of 1997 and 2001 to predict final pathological stage in clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Augustin H; Eggert T; Wenske S; Karakiewicz PI; Palisaar J; Daghofer F; Huland H; Graefen M
    J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):177-81. PubMed ID: 14665871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.