268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27064944)
21. Assessing lateral uterine wall defects and residual myometrial thickness after cesarean section.
Al Naimi A; Mouzakiti N; Wolnicki B; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Mar; 258():391-395. PubMed ID: 33540191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The association of endometrial closure during cesarean section to the risk of developing uterine scar defect: a randomized control trial.
Mohr-Sasson A; Castel E; Dadon T; Brandt A; Etinger R; Cohen A; Zajicek M; Haas J; Mashiach R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 May; 309(5):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 38498161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Feasibility of prediction of cesarean section scar dehiscence in the third trimester by three-dimensional ultrasound.
Mansour GM; El-Mekkawi SF; Khairy HT; Mossad AE
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 May; 28(8):944-8. PubMed ID: 24962499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Anatomy of the sonographic post-cesarean uterus.
Al Naimi A; Wolnicki B; Mouzakiti N; Reinbach T; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Dec; 304(6):1485-1491. PubMed ID: 33891206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the Cesarean Scar Niche In Women With Secondary Infertility Undergoing ICSI Using 2D Sonohysterography Versus 3D Sonohysterography and Setting a Standard Criteria; Alalfy Simple Rules for Scar Assessment by Ultrasound To Prevent Health Problems for Women.
Alalfy M; Osman OM; Salama S; Lasheen Y; Soliman M; Fikry M; Ramadan M; Alaa D; Elshemy S; Abdella R
Int J Womens Health; 2020; 12():965-974. PubMed ID: 33177887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of Cesarean section scar using saline contrast sonohysterography in women with previous Cesarean scar pregnancy.
Pekar-Zlotin M; Maymon R; Nimrodi M; Zur-Naaman H; Melcer Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Apr; 63(4):551-555. PubMed ID: 37983614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Agreement between transvaginal ultrasound and saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluation of cesarean scar defect.
Rasheedy R; Sammour H; Elkholy A; Fadel E
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Dec; 48(10):827-831. PubMed ID: 31077871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Roberge S; Demers S; Girard M; Vikhareva O; Markey S; Chaillet N; Moore L; Paris G; Bujold E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):507.e1-507.e6. PubMed ID: 26522861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ultrasound evaluation of the Cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting.
Bij de Vaate AJ; Brölmann HA; van der Voet LF; van der Slikke JW; Veersema S; Huirne JA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 21031351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Changes in uterine flexion caused by cesarean section: correlation between post-flexion and deficient cesarean section scars.
Ryo E; Sakurai R; Kamata H; Seto M; Morita M; Ayabe T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2016 Apr; 43(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 27033868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. First and Third Trimester Uterine Scar Thickness in Women With Previous Caesarean: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Paquette K; Markey S; Roberge S; Girard M; Bujold E; Demers S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Jan; 41(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 30316720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Changes in the Uterine Scar during the First Year after a Caesarean Section: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
van der Voet LF; Jordans IPM; Brölmann HAM; Veersema S; Huirne JAF
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(2):164-170. PubMed ID: 28957798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Changes in Cesarean section scar dimensions during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study.
Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Saso S; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 23108803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Uterine niche after cesarean section: a review of diagnostic methods.
Budny-Winska J; Pomorski M
Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(10):726-730. PubMed ID: 34747000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Interest of saline contrast sonohysterography for the diagnosis of cesarean scar defects].
Giral E; Capmas P; Levaillant JM; Berman A; Fernandez H
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Nov; 43(11):693-8. PubMed ID: 26603330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pilot study of MRI/ultrasound fusion imaging in postpartum assessment of Cesarean section scar.
Bolten K; Fischer T; Bender YY; Diederichs G; Thomas A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):520-526. PubMed ID: 27804175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section.
Zhou X; Zhang T; Qiao H; Zhang Y; Wang X
BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 33985487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination.
Osser OV; Jokubkiene L; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 19499514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Laparoscopic Repair of Cesarean Scar Defect "Isthmocele".
Urman B; Arslan T; Aksu S; Taskiran C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):857-8. PubMed ID: 27006058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar after segmental transverse cesarean surgery].
Bazzo JM; Tambara EM; Campos AC; Feijó Rde P
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2012 May; 34(5):221-7. PubMed ID: 22584857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
